You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

Well Educated Voters Might Be Moving Public Policy Polling Results

Public Policy Polling nailed the 2008 results, but PPP’s polls have sometimes seemed a little strange so far in 2012. First, they leaned heavily toward Obama. Then they came back down to earth, but showed Obama struggling among non-white voters (an unlikely scenario). So what’s going on? It might be education.

Since their June 14-to-17 survey, PPP has released educational breakdowns for their DailyKos/SEIU national tracking poll. In every survey, PPP's respondents have been better educated than the 2008 electorate. PPP doesn’t weight for education, and less-educated voters are less likely to respond to pollsters, so this might not be especially surprising. But, it's possible that response rates among less-educated voters are even more lower for automated pollsters than live interviews.


Oversampling postgraduates and undersampling high school graduates could make a difference. Democrats excel among voters with a postgraduate degree—Obama won them by 18 points in 2008. In contrast, Obama did worse among high school-educated voters, only winning them by 6 percent in 2008 (slightly lower than his 7 point victory nationally). If recent polls showing Obama performing poorly among high school-educated voters are accurate, then the education gap could widen, making the educational composition of a poll more significant than it was in 2008. 

Just how significant? Well, re-weighting PPP's results to reflect the exit polls would produce a consistent but slight shift in Romney’s direction—up to a net-2 points in some of their polls. However, this simple "re-weight" doesn't necessarily reflect a hypothetical poll properly weighted by education, since just re-weighting by education might throw other variables, like race, out of alignment.

Education might also help explain PPP's odd racial sub-samples. While most polling firms show Obama scoring well among minorities but struggling among white voters, PPP shows the opposite, with Obama performing near 2008-levels among whites, but down nearly 10 points among non-white voters. Education could help explain this phenomenon: If Obama is performing well among college-educated whites but struggling among those without a college degree, then oversampling well-educated voters would tend to inflate Obama’s standing among whites. The reverse is true for minorities: Obama does better among less-educated minorities and worse among those with a college degree.

Many pollsters don't weight for education, and PPP just happens to admirably releases comprehensive cross-tabs. But it's possible that this is a bigger issue for automated pollsters with low-response rates. Remember, though: These issues might fade as we approach the election, especially if less-educated low interest voters become more likely to respond to pollsters.