You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

Rubio’s child tax credit isn’t friendly to poor families (by design).


Once upon a time, the Rubio-Lee child tax credit was the centerpiece of a newish brand of family-friendly compassionate conservatism that was said to be the future of the Republican Party. With the rise of Trumpism, Rubio’s proposal has gotten less attention, but at tonight’s Republican debate in South Carolina the senator was given a chance to defend it from the accusation of liberal-esque social engineering.

“Parenting is the most important job many of us will have,” Rubio said, adding that raising children is one of the most important jobs in society at large. Parents should be helped, he argued, to “invest in their children, to go to school, to go to a private school, to buy a new backpack.” 

“Family is the most important institution in society,” he went on, to applause. “You cannot have a strong country without strong families.” 

True. But Rubio’s tax credit is not fully refundable, meaning that the poorest families will benefit least from it. It’s not clear if this is a feature of Rubio’s plan, or a bug; some of his defenders have praised the credit’s meager provisions for poor families as a useful correction for naughty single mothers. So much for parenting being the most important job there is.