You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

Is Chris Rock responsible for the Oscars’ low, low ratings?

Christopher Polk/Getty

Last night’s Academy Awards hit an eight year-low, and were the third lowest-rated in the history of the broadcast. But while some on Twitter (and Matt Drudge) have blamed Rock, there’s no evidence that he’s responsible. Here’s what really caused the decline: 

The Oscars’ ratings are generally in decline: Last year’s ceremony, hosted by the whitest host ever Neil Patrick Harris, were the lowest-rated in six years. 

After expanding the number of Best Picture nominees to include fan favorites, the Oscars has mostly reverted back to quiet, sophisticated, indie-ish movies: The main movies in contention, with the exception of Mad Max: Fury Road, were not exactly blockbusters, and viewers tend to tune out the awards when smaller films (like Spotlight) are dominant. A few more nominations for, say, Star Wars or Dirty Grandpa and it’s likely that the Oscars would’ve seen a ratings uptick. 

The boycott probably made an impact: While there isn’t any evidence that it’s solely (or even strongly) behind a drop-off in the millions, it seems safe to say that the #OscarsSoWhite boycott made a difference—and it’s certainly safer to make that argument than to say that Rock should bear the blame.