You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

Greens And Reds

Last week, when Al Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection launched a $300 million public awareness initiative, I belived it would be influential in helping to build the political will needed to confront the energy crisis. As Gore said: "The elected officials in both parties are going to be timid about enacting the bold changes that are needed until there is a change in the public's sense of urgency in addressing this crisis." Sure.

It appears, however, the campaign's first brush with the body politic hasn't gone so well. A Rasmussen study played the first ad for Democrats, Republicans and Independents, whose disparate reactions suggest we have work to do.

It's worth watching both videos here--the first illustrates a certain age bias WRT climate change--but the second (above) shows the shocking partisanship that has seized the reins of the environmental debate discussion. I hesitate to say "debate;" in the final analysis, the denialists will be judged alongside the quaint anti-Copernicans of the 16th century. But of those who flatlined when the ad's green-talk began, how many truly subscribe to the compelling "no we can't" worldview, and how many are just walking the party line?

More importantly, how can any liberal--even Al Gore--fix the perception gap? My hunch: they're going to need some prominent GOP "converts" to take this thing to scale.

--Dayo Olopade