You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

Who In Mccainland Can You Believe These Days?

Quick question, per this interview in which McCain economic adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin disparages McCain economic adviser Phil Gramm: If, as Holtz-Eakin says, Gramm wasn't in any way speaking for McCain because only McCain speaks for McCain, why on earth should we believe him (Holtz-Eakin)? Why would Holtz-Eakin's words be any more reliable than Gramm's? Isn't he just as far from being John McCain as Phil Gramm is?

I'm afraid we've stumbled onto a bit of a paradox here:

If Holtz-Eakin is right about other people not speaking for McCain, then we can't believe him when he makes that point.

And if Holtz-Eakin is wrong about other people not speaking for McCain, then we can believe him in general, but, of course, what he just said turns out to be wrong

I think my head is about to explode...

--Noam Scheiber