Earlier this week, the Boston Globe ran what was virtually an epitaph, a very long epitaph for itself. The author blamed the paper's owner--the New York Times Company--for most of its troubles. There was a lot of nostalgia for the old publishing family, the Taylors, who sold the newspaper to the Sulzbergers. (The Times is actually a public company dominated by the family because of two classes of stock, one with power, one without. The Sulzbergers own the controlling stock. But the family trust  is being ripped apart: its beneficiaries no longer are getting dividends.)  In any case, the Taylors had the Boston paper in good times and they sold out for more than $1 billion.  Now, the Globe is in torment, like the Times itself. 

But so are almost all of the newspapers in the country.  Even the Washington Post Company, whose other properties include the Kaplan educational network, a big money-maker. But Donny Graham, one of my first students, has warned his stockholders of many troubles ahead. The Financial Times story that includes this bad news also reports that Newsweek is having a relaunch. Frankly, I think that the tired weekly is actually trying to become The New Republic. Go ahead and try!  

One ballast on the Washington Post's board is Warren Buffett.  His mere presence probably reassured investors. No longer. The greatest success story in modern American capitalism has been having trouble, mucho trouble. His company, Berkshire Hathaway, has lost its high credit ratings, and his stock (in both Class A and Class B) is way down, by a third when I last looked, having reached lows at about half of the top.

Back to the Globe and the Times. Not content to have done its own death knell, Friday's Globe reported worse news for the Times even before it was announced: "Analysts braced for bleak news in Times Co. first-quarter report."  The quarterly financial accounting is scheduled to be made public Tuesday.  There was actually a touch of Schadenfreude in the article.