You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

Krugman vs. Brooks (And Germany)

David Brooks today says there has been a "natural experiment" of the propostion that a bigger stimulus promotes economic growth. America had a big stimulus, Germany didn't, and now germany is growing faster:

This divergence created a natural experiment. Who was right?
The early returns suggest the Germans were. The American stimulus package was supposed to create a “summer of recovery,” according to Obama administration officials. Job growth was supposed to be surging at up to 500,000 a month. Instead, the U.S. economy is scuffling along.
The German economy, on the other hand, is growing at a sizzling (and obviously unsustainable) 9 percent annual rate. Unemployment in Germany has come down to pre-crisis levels.

Fortunately enough, this argument was already pre-butted by Paul Krugman on his blog a couple days ago:

[I]t’s also worth having some perspective on actual German performance to date. Here’s a chart:


Everything you’ve been hearing is about that uptick at the end. But I’m not willing to declare an economy that has yet to recover to the pre-crisis level of GDP an economic miracle.
Basically, here’s the German story: it’s an economy that didn’t have a housing bubble, so it wasn’t caught up directly in the bust. But it’s very export-oriented, with a focus on durable manufactured goods. Demand for these goods plunged in the early stages of the crisis — so that Germany, remarkably, had a bigger GDP decline than the bubble economies — but has bounced back since summer 2009. This has pulled Germany back up; exports to China have done especially well.

The giveaway line in Brooks' column is "natural experiment." There's no such thing as a natural experiment in macroeconomics. You can have a natural experiment in micro-economics -- treat one group of workers one way, and treat a control group a different way. But whole economies are too large to run experiments with -- there are always innumerable other factors at play.