You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

John Raese, Joe Manchin, And The Costs And Benefits Of Disunity

The West Virginia Senate race is a perfect example of the two parties' diametrical approach to nominating candidates. It's a poor, socially conservative, and increasingly Republican state. The Democrats have nominated Joe Manchin, the popular governor who is running an ad featuring him shooting the cap and trade bill with a rifle, a hilariously over-the-top authenticity two-fer.

The Republican nominee is John Raese. A very conservative Republican could win in West Virginia this year, if he were a populist extreme social conservative. That's not John Raese. He's a very rich guy whose family resides in Florida for tax purposes. Raese proposes to abolish the minimum wage, and has defined the ability to inherit a multimillion dollar fortune tax-free as the essence of the American dream:

RAESE: I made my money the old-fashioned way, I inherited it. I think that’s a great thing to do. I hope more people in this country have that opportunity as soon as we abolish inheritance tax in this country, which is a key part of my program.

I'm sure West Virginians can relate.

Now, if Manchin wins, he'll give the Democrats a hard time on all kinds of issues. Liberals are going to want to strangle him on numerous occassions. If Raese wins, he'll be a solid vote, especially on issues relating to protecting the financial interests of the rich that form the beating heart of the Republican agenda. But I don't think Raese is going to win.

And that's how Democrats end up with a large, fractious caucus extending far into red states, and Republicans have a small, tightly-disciplined caucus.