You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

NFL Overtime Reform And Progressive Overreach


Steven Brams and James Jorash propose a new system to eliminate the advantage of receiving the ball first in NFL overtime games:

Dispensing with a coin toss, the teams would bid on where the ball is kicked from by the kicking team. In the NFL, it's now the 30-yard line. Under Brams and Jorasch's rule, the kicking team would be the team that bids the lower number, because it is willing to put itself at a disadvantage by kicking from farther back. However, it would not kick from the number it bids, but from the average of the two bids.
To illustrate, assume team A bids to kick from the 38-yard line, while team B bids its 32-yard line. Team B would win the bidding and, therefore, be designated as the kick-off team. But B wouldn't kick from 32, but instead from the average of 38 and 32--its 35-yard line
This is better for B by 3 yards than the 32-yard line that it proposed, because it's closer to the end zone it is kicking towards. It's also better for A by 3 yards to have B kick from the 35-yard line, rather than from the 38-yard line, it proposed if it were the kick-off team.

Andrew Gelman comments, "This seems like a good idea." This strikes me as some kind of parody of liberal technocracy failing to take culture into account. Am I the only one here who has any sense of what football coaches and fans are like? Do I have to explain what would happen if they actually tried to implement a system like this? Okay: About half the coaches would be unable to understand the concept, and you'd routinely have teams kicking off from like their own three yard line or the opponent's 25. 90% of the television announcers would pronounce the system incomprehensible and ridicule it ceaselessly. Fans would revolt.

If you want to eliminate -- or almost eliminate -- the coin-flip advantage, why not just implement the college football overtime system?