You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

Donald Trump is trying to ruin the EPA, just like he promised.


During the GOP primaries, Trump said of the Environmental Protection Agency, “We are going to get rid of it in almost every form. We’re going to have little tidbits left but we’re going to take a tremendous amount out.” But in the president’s joint address to Congress on Tuesday night, he vowed “to promote clean air and clear water.” Which is it?

The former. Inside EPA reports that Trump’s imminent budget proposal for fiscal year 2018 includes a 25 percent cut to EPA’s budget, which will reportedly manifest in mass layoffs and buyouts, and the end of quite a few popular environmental programs.

Here are a few things in Trump’s budget proposal that have been reported:

  • Trump will recommend reducing the agency’s workforce of 15,000 by 20 percent, so to about 12,000.
  • The grants EPA gave to states, including some to clean up air pollution, would be cut by 30 percent.
  • Programs to clean up brownfields, aka polluted industrial waste sites, would be defunded entirely.
  • Environmental justice programs, which focus on cleanup and protection for low-income and minority groups, would be eliminated.
  • Climate-change initiatives; funding for native Alaskan villages; and the Global Change Research program, which provides information on changes to the environment, would be cut.

The proposed cuts have already drawn bipartisan criticism from former EPA administrators. Gina McCarthy, who served under President Obama, said on Wednesday the cuts are “actually going to be devastating for the agency’s ability to protect public health.” Christine Todd Whitman, who led the Environmental Protection Agency under George W. Bush, also urged the Trump administration on Thursday to reconsider such sweeping cuts.

Even some Republicans on Capitol Hill are critical of the proposal. Representative Mike Simpson of Idaho told The Washington Post he doubted Congress would approve such extreme cuts, saying, “There’s not that much in the EPA, for crying out loud.”