Lee Zeldin was struggling to answer basic questions about climate change in a foreboding sign for the agency.

Republicans have suggested conditioning the relief funds to California.

Senator Tommy Tuberville has some thoughts on aid for the Los Angeles fires.

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s new theory is just as bad as her first one.

As Los Angeles burns, Trump and his allies are exploiting tragedy to push their favorite grievances about “diversity” and water management.

Damage from the Los Angeles fires is likely to be the most expensive in national history.

Unfortunately timed budget decisions are making it that much harder to battle the fires.

Donald Trump tried and failed to explain basic household appliances.

The case is a harbinger of intrastate conflict to come, as red-state attorneys general ramp up their campaigns against blue-state governance.

President Biden may have just saved 625 million acres of ocean from offshore drilling.

After some shocking discoveries a few years back, Maine has led the charge in banning the use of sewage-based fertilizers, which have been found to contaminate farmlands with PFAS. Getting national policies on the books, however, may prove much harder.

Donald Trump is showing his true priorities.

A Brown University study found that organized opposition to wind energy was fueled by extensive “information” from the fossil fuel industry.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals just threw a major wrench into the effort to protect the planet—and teed up another chance for the Supreme Court to take a bite out of the administrative state.

For climate activists, the current moment is almost unbearably bleak. But the task is clear: to build a mass movement that completely overhauls our current political system.

Exxon Mobil CEO Darren Woods is warning about Donald Trump’s grim climate plans.

Lee Zeldin has gladly accepted Trump’s decision to nominate him for EPA administrator. This will be a disaster.

An environmental regulations case may potentially test Chief Justice John Roberts’s propensity for inventing novel legal doctrines out of thin air.

The high court will hear a trio of cases that might permit environmental scofflaws greater leave to go forum shopping for friendly lower court judges.

A gun case and a death penalty case are among those on the docket—with zero sign that the conservative majority cares about the court’s falling reputation.