You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

Speaking of Liberal Bogeymen ...

As Marin so keenly pointed out the other day, high-ranking GOPers continue to cling to and promote falsehoods about the Democratic agenda, despite (sometimes overwhelming) evidence to the contrary. This time, it's Senator John Cornyn taking from the Palin-Grassley playbook. Earlier this month, he was outraged by the White House's web-based program that solicited emails and tips about the spread of health care misinformation. He claimed that it created an enemies list akin to that of Nixon, and infringed on citizens' First Amendment right. Despite the dismantling of the program, Cornyn sent an equally harsh follow-up letter yesterday, promising that he won't back down until "actions have been taken to purge the data, the names, email address, IP addresses, and private speech of U.S. citizens who had their speech reported." To Cornyn, this domestic surveillance is intolerable--an interesting position in light of this exchange between the senator and then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales about wartime executive power in 2006:

SEN. CORNYN: General Gonzales, I regret to say that when I was, just a few minutes ago, watching the crawler or the caption in a cable news network, it referred to domestic surveillance, which strikes me as a fundamental error in the accuracy of the reporting of what's going on here. You've made clear that what's been authorized here is not domestic surveillance; that is, starting from and ending in the United States. This is an international surveillance with known al Qaeda operatives. Correct?

ATTY GEN. GONZALES: I think people who call this a domestic surveillance program are doing a disservice to the American people. It would be like flying from Texas to Poland and saying that's a domestic flight. We know that's not true. That would be an international flight. And what we're talking about are international communications. And so I agree with your point, Senator.

[Emphasis mine]

While the situation here is of course a little different, I think that the same principle applies. In the complex issue of what crosses the First Amendment line in "surveillance," things often get misrepresented to create public outrage or fear. But this time around Cornyn is the one doing what Gonzales called a "disservice."