You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.
Skip Navigation

Steve Bannon Said Trump Reminded Him of Hitler. He Meant It as a Compliment.

Now Marjorie Taylor Greene calls three GOP senators “pro-pedophile.” These people are sociopaths.

Steve Bannon listens to Trump at a Cabinet meeting
Steve Bannon listens to Trump at a Cabinet meeting in 2017.

If you doubt we’ve grown too accustomed to aberrant behavior in the political class, consider this anecdote from the recently published Insurgency: How the Republicans Lost Their Party and Got Everything They Ever Wanted by Jeremy W. Peters of The New York Times. Peters is describing Steve Bannon watching Donald Trump on TV as Trump descends by the Trump Tower escalator to announce his presidential candidacy:

That’s Hitler, Bannon thought, as the opening scene of Leni Riefenstahl’s seminal work of Nazi propaganda, Triumph of the Will, flashed through his mind. He meant it as a compliment.

Peters’s publication of those two sentences drew not a peep of public protest from Bannon nor a single mention from a major American newspaper—not even Peters’s own, until a New York Times reviewer flagged them on February 22. Even that reviewer, Romesh Ratnesar of Bloomberg Opinion, concluded the book wouldn’t likely interest many readers. The editors of the Times Book Review apparently agreed, because they didn’t commit Ratnesar’s review to newsprint until April 4, which is when I caught up with it. And gasped.

That Trump’s future campaign manager and White House chief strategist admired Trump because Trump reminded him of Adolf Hitler, and that Bannon apparently (“Bannon thought”) shared this repulsive sentiment with a reporter, and that neither the press nor the public was especially shocked when those two sentences got published—all that is an example of what the late sociologist and Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan called, in an influential 1993 essay, “Defining Deviancy Down.”

We used to call people who think like Bannon sociopaths. Now we just call them Republicans.

Moynihan’s essay was based on the sociologist Kai Erikson’s observation that the proportion of people whom society deems deviant remains constant over time even as the supply of actual deviants ebbs and flows. When actual deviants are in short supply, Moynihan argued, the quota gets filled by reclassifying normal behaviors as deviant. The result is intolerance, which liberals deplore. When actual deviants are in surplus, the overflow gets reclassified as perfectly normal. The result is excessive tolerance, which conservatives deplore.

Moynihan, a social conservative, called the second of these (the legitimization of deviant behavior) “defining deviancy down,” and the examples he cited (redefinition of the mentally ill as homeless; regarding out-of-wedlock birth as normal; and accepting horrifically high levels of violent crime) were conservative culture-war targets when he published his essay back in 1993. Except for violent crime, none remained hot-button topics in the culture wars, mainly because all three declined in subsequent years (especially violent crime).

Today’s screaming culture-war fights are more likely to be about LGBTQ rights, Covid-19 vaccinations, and (thanks to vile conspiracy-mongering by QAnon) pedophilia. Except for the first, these three targets don’t fit Moynihan’s template. Yes, society is being asked to revise its previous notions about gender, and it’s no surprise that conservatives hate that. But vaccinations aren’t new, just newly controversial, and pedophilia is neither more accepted nor (as best anyone can tell) any more common than it ever was. Culture wars are being fought over them anyway because the deviancy that’s being defined down is that of the cultural warriors themselves. Sociopaths have burrowed into the halls of power.

They seem especially visible in the House of Representatives. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, tweeted Monday: “Murkowski, Collins, and Romney are pro-pedophile. They just voted for #KBJ.” That isn’t just false and extremist. It’s depraved. #KBJ is Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson, whom Senate Republicans smeared hatefully during her confirmation hearings as soft on child pornography. (Repeated fact-checks demonstrated Jackson’s rulings in child pornography cases were well within the mainstream, even compared to some Trump-appointed judges.) Senate Republicans leveled this accusation because they’re crudely partisan, not because they believe it. Taylor Greene took them at their word and applied the same reasoning to fellow Republicans who voted to advance Jackson’s nomination to the Senate floor. That’s something only a sociopath would do.

Greene has already been stripped of her committee assignments for previous well-known episodes of derangement, so I think it only fair that she chair the House Sociopath Caucus.

Vice chair goes to Madison Cawthorn, at 26 the youngest and second-most-deranged Republican in Congress. In a podcast last month, Cawthorn said fellow Republicans had invited him to attend orgies (“Well hey, we’re going to have kind of a sexual get together at one of our homes, you should come”) and take drugs (“Some of the people that are leading on the movement to try and remove addiction in our country and then you watch them do, you know, a key bump of cocaine right in front of you”). It’s tempting to believe Cawthorn was being indiscreet, but given the long trail of outrageous lies he’s told in the past, more likely it was just a bizarre smear of his own party.

I don’t mean to suggest that members of the House Sociopath Caucus are limited to Republicans who say awful things about fellow Republicans. Sometimes their pathologies express themselves through partisanship. That’s the case with another charter member, Representative Paul Gosar, who posted an animated video of himself killing Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That won him the first House censure since 2010. Undaunted, Gosar later joined Taylor Greene at an event organized by someone the Anti-Defamation League called “a well-known white supremacist.”

Then there’s Representative Lauren Boebert. Boebert never misses a meeting of the House Sociopath Caucus. She’s best known for heckling President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address. Granted, we’ve seen a House member heckle a State of the Union address before (Representative Joe Wilson in 2009: “You lie!”). But Boebert heckled Biden while he was talking about his son dying of cancer after being exposed to a toxic burn pit when he served in Afghanistan. That elevates Boebert’s behavior from extremely crude to sociopathic. Most recently, Boebert pledged to vote against any copyright extension for Mickey Mouse because Disney is a “woke” company because it opposes the state’s homophobic new “Don’t Say Gay” law, which bars classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in public schools. (Not that allowing Disney’s copyright to expire in 2024, 96 years after Mickey’s debut, will get any complaint from me: See “Defund the Dead,” December 2021.)

For only one sociopath to hold a seat in Congress is notable. To have four (Florida Republican Matt Gaetz’s pending application to become the fifth member of the Sociopath Caucus is, I’m told, receiving serious consideration) looks like an incipient political movement. And we’ll get more in 2023 if the conspiracy theorist Ron Watkins wins in Arizona’s second congressional district or Noah Malgeri, who’s called for the execution of Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley on live TV, wins in Nevada’s third congressional district.

Certain districts just seem to prefer sociopathic candidates. Bill Eddy, a therapist, lawyer, mediator, and author of the 2019 book Why We Elect Narcissists and Sociopaths, suggests that we all of us potentially live in such districts. He calls political sociopaths “high-conflict personalities,” or HCPs, and he says they’re good at attracting attention in divisive times.

HCPs are bad at pretty much everything else. They have “a preoccupation with blaming others,” Eddy writes; they’re given to “all-or-nothing thinking”; they have “unmanaged or intense emotions”; and they’re incapable of emotional intimacy, self-awareness, or ever changing in any way.

Eddy estimates that HCPs constitute 10 percent of the population. I’m not willing to believe that. I’d say the members of the House Sociopath Caucus are representative of perhaps 1 percent of the population. I refuse to live in a world where they’re representative of more than 2 or 3 percent. But don’t get me started on the Senate.