The vanity agency the billionaire oligarch is getting from Trump probably won’t accomplish much beyond giving him and partner Vivek Ramaswamy more of what they desperately crave—attention.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals just threw a major wrench into the effort to protect the planet—and teed up another chance for the Supreme Court to take a bite out of the administrative state.

In a long-running fight with Washington, the Beehive State’s top politicos have found a novel way to escalate the conflict with the Supreme Court.

Their interests are being litigated with deftness and aplomb, but more needs to be done outside the courtroom to start turning the tide.

Funding cuts have critical all-trimester facilities on the brink of collapse—and the ripple effects to public health could be profound.

Can the Aloha State defy the Roberts court on a controversial Second Amendment decision? They may soon find out.

An environmental regulations case may potentially test Chief Justice John Roberts’s propensity for inventing novel legal doctrines out of thin air.

The high court will hear a trio of cases that might permit environmental scofflaws greater leave to go forum shopping for friendly lower court judges.

William Rehnquist went from a lonely dissenter to an institutionalist chief—and his opinions are all the rage among the court’s current conservatives.

During his presidency, the high court’s conservatives proved to be resistant to the idea that Donald Trump was their legal client. This year, that all changed.

Now that the right has abandoned the Founders, the Harris-Walz campaign has the chance to flaunt this winning rebrand. They should take it.

There’s an arcane concept from the 1700s that underpins the attack on reproductive rights: the idea that women are incapable of making their own decisions.

Here are some ideas to help Democrats close the deal with the widest possible swath of persuadable voters.

The overturning of Roe was always going to affect more than just abortion, and we’re about to find out how bad it can get.

His latest brief in the January 6 case inadvertently suggests how a future President Trump could cling to power through “official” acts.

A gun case and a death penalty case are among those on the docket—with zero sign that the conservative majority cares about the court’s falling reputation.

The right to criticize the powerful is a cornerstone of democracy. In Trump’s America, it’s cause for a prison sentence.

A new case the high court may take up this term concerns when judges should recuse themselves. It’s a problem with which these justices are intimately familiar.

Overshadowed by ballot measures and the presidential race, mutual aid groups that pay for people’s abortions are teaming up with state advocates to better their bottom lines.