The president has decided that there is one neat trick for earning judicial compliance for a range of vanity projects and constitutional abuses.

Court-watchers will get an early look at just how audacious the conservative bloc is going to be this fall.

The Protect College Sports Act will only protect the NCAA’s billions. It deserves to go down in flames.

The high court declines to let Trump blow up the midterms, but this should have been a unanimous decision.

The Supreme Court will consider whether to overturn state bans on assault weapons—alongside some rather disturbing arguments.

No, the high court hasn’t had a change of heart where gerrymandering is concerned. But it does seem to have little stomach for electoral chicanery.

The high court’s recent decision on the illegal addition to the White House shines a light on just how willing it is to let Donald Trump break the law.

With South Carolina Democrat Jim Clyburn now in favor of expanding the high court, Democrats seem to have accepted that changing the status quo is necessary.

The high court’s shadow-docket decision isn’t the final word on mail-in ballots, but it reveals the conservative bloc’s comfort with the administration’s voter suppression schemes.

The LAPD wrecked a business owner’s shop while chasing a fugitive, and the city is refusing to compensate him. The next stop could be the Roberts court.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has gone to war with the state regulators trying to rein in the industry’s sports gambling interests.

The White House is serving up a staler helping of the legal arguments the Roberts court already refused to swallow.

The courts may have closed the book on this sorry chapter of our history, but the dreadful reckoning remains.

The president’s gluttony for graft is the only truly remarkable thing about his political career.

Much of what ails us can be blamed on the steady degradation of the legislature as the other branches of government grabbed power for themselves. It’s time to start undoing the damage.

The justice recently contended against the notion that the court has become a rubber stamp for Trump. She’s not wrong—but that’s just part of the story.

These are the ingredients that have set up a major Supreme Court case about excessive fines that could shape the future of criminal asset forfeiture across the United States.

The high court’s decision in Landor v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections and Public Safety could incapacitate the legislative branch’s policymaking powers.

In the high court’s latest term, the chief practitioners of this purportedly neutral doctrine had a hard time keeping their stories straight.