A recent lower court ruling asserting a constitutional right to own military hardware suggests that the conservative legal movement has the country on a grim path.

In his new book he rails against the regulatory state and explains why judges should have its power instead.

Biden has repeatedly refused to endorse “court-packing.” The right-wing justices’ ruling on presidential immunity ought to change his mind.

The courts no longer have to bow to executive whims, which may give noncitizens a better chance.

Striking down Chevron isn’t “calling balls and strikes.” It’s changing the strike zone, the size of the plate, and even the field.

The right-wing justices declared open season on regulations that don’t just protect the environment, health, and safety, but the economy too.

Clarence Thomas says Jack Smith should go back to The Hague and prosecute European war criminals, because American fascists are now officially immune.

The conservative justices have ignored history altogether and created a shocking new precedent: The president is above the law.

The liberal justice, dissenting from the majority’s ruling on Trump’s immunity case, quoted the court’s Dobbs decision back to them.

Monday’s immunity ruling made the stakes of this election even higher—and made it clear that Biden must step aside for someone who can stop Trump and save the country.

Killing off Chevron deference, the court moves power to the judicial branch, portending chaos.

Thursday’s ruling in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy avoided the worst-case scenarios.

The Framers designed the judiciary as the weakest branch. John Marshall changed all that. And today, we’re paying the price for it.

Idaho hospitals may perform emergency abortions—for now.

The justices have picked a case that can cause maximum harm with minimum blowback.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

But will the high court follow long-standing precedent or its more recent trends?

She’s still conservative, but she seems to want to prevent her Supreme Court colleagues from going too far too quickly.

People can and should debate Windsor’s methods. What’s beyond debate is that she reveals important truths we’re better off knowing.