In a controversial shadow-docket ruling, the high court’s conservative bloc has fully dismantled the constitutional protections of Black voters.

While it’s not a surprise that the high court reached a just conclusion, it’s troubling to see how many justices didn’t join the majority.

It was a limited victory, but it broke with the high court’s long-standing favor toward the death penalty.

The president has long been operating under the assumption that he is immune from prosecution. His latest scheme, however, may be a step too far.

A recent shadow docket decision suggests that the court isn’t hungry for further legal restrictions on abortion. But there are two familiar holdouts.

The justice has significant—and familiar—conflicts of interest in an upcoming Big Oil case. The question is: Will he recuse himself?

Time was that David Souter was the bête noire of the right wing. But now judges like Amy Coney Barrett aren’t passing muster.

Despite their handing him an endless array of political wins over the past few years, the president still believes his nominees haven’t shown sufficient loyalty.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority is trying to drive the party to extinction. What do they plan to do about it?

The chief justice insists he and his colleagues are not political actors, but can’t explain what an overtly politicized right-wing court would do differently from the one he leads.

The Supreme Court’s recent gerrymandering ruling has touched off an instantaneous demolition of Black political power as state lawmakers roll back the Second Reconstruction.

If U.S. electoral politics is going to survive the high court’s attack on equal rights, the game will have to change.

The conservative bloc has dismantled the law that ensures that Black Americans can fully participate in American electoral politics.

While the push is another example of the administration’s anti-immigrant animus, it does not have a free hand to kick masses of naturalized citizens out of the country.

In his recent broadside against the twentieth century, the justice is as ill informed as he is mean-spirited.

The president won’t increase the conservative bloc’s margins, but he could more deeply entrench the high court’s Trumpist bent.

The recent oral arguments in an important voting rights case suggest that the right wing of the high court has a suspect media diet.

The high court’s campaign to provide cover to the quid pro quo arrangement of corrupt politicians seems set to continue.

In McGirt v. Oklahoma, the high court opened the door to an expansive view of tribal territory. The State of Oklahoma has been trying to shut it ever since.