Wednesday’s oral arguments in a challenge of Mississippi’s abortion law reveal that a majority of justices want to gut abortion rights in America.

The Supreme Court’s 6–3 tilt is inspiring right-wing judicial actors to take legal moon shots they wouldn’t have dared to attempt not long ago.

The high court’s unusually generous predisposition to faith-based claims takes a back seat to Samuel Alito’s determination to end the “guerrilla war on the death penalty.”

The high court will decide whether the First Amendment prevents elected bodies from disciplining their own members.

The Roberts court may have no choice but to resolve a sprawling case that threatens the Indian Child Welfare Act and the legal regime that has supported Native people.

The public’s esteem of the high court is at an all-time low, and the media is not to blame.

Officials from the island territory contend that Congress overstepped its bounds by ending the sport.

The Supreme Court will take up a case that bundles concerns over qualified immunity with a consequential First Amendment dispute.

His time working for Monsanto and other polluting industries helped make him the fierce conservative he is today.

In little-heralded decisions, the Roberts court has moved to entrench judicial supremacy and destroy the legislative branch.

Don’t be fooled by the burst of moderation from the justices this term.

For opponents of the Affordable Care Act, this latest slapdash effort to gut the landmark law may be the last hurrah.

Under the guise of “religious liberty,” the conservative justices are privileging certain Americans at the expense of the rest of us.

For all the hype about the spiritual beliefs of Trump’s nominee, the court’s current majority has firmly established a new order.

James O’Keefe’s group is part of a sprawling campaign to delegitimize mail-in balloting in the fall—a campaign being led by the White House.

The justice’s dissent in a little-regarded case strikes an important blow against the right’s efforts to decimate the federal government.

Guns rights advocates want more than just a victory. They want this newly emboldened conservative court to wield maximal power.

Joe Biden set the stage for Donald Trump's racial scapegoating. Why can't he admit that he was wrong?

The Justice has always shown a disregard for precedent, but with a shift in Supreme Court personnel, undoing progress could be the law of the land.

Passing a federal law to enshrine Roe v. Wade would require control of the White House and Congress—and approval from the Supreme Court.