Donald Trump is moving to avoid consequences once again.

The president is worried that his tariffs case before the court has big holes. Canadian officials have confirmed those fears are well founded.

A legal battle between California Governor Gavin Newsom and the president will decide whether the president’s autocratic use of the National Guard is above board.

Here are the four categories of people who enable the president’s fascism.

In another one of their “history and tradition” tests, the justices stand poised to upend laws all across the country.

The court’s majority typically doesn’t disclose their reasoning on shadow docket cases. Here’s one instance where a justice may regret speaking their mind.

The Roberts court has long had a monomaniacal obsession with gutting the laws that guarantee the right to vote. They are on the brink of getting their wish.

The Supreme Court rejected Alex Jones’s request to challenge the more than $1 billion he owes to families of Sandy Hook shooting victims.

The right-wing majority has veered hard in the direction of the unitary executive theory—and a schism with conservative legal scholars is starting to widen.

Donald Trump has been saying the quiet part out loud for some time now.

At oral arguments, the high court’s conservatives seemed inclined to back gay conversion therapy. But they ultimately may not stop there.

Donald Trump suddenly has no clue who Ghislaine Maxwell is.

The Supreme Court refused to hear the far-right commentator’s censorship case.

The Supreme Court is not interested in saving Jeffrey Epstein’s accomplice.

Stopping and reversing the degradation of the Trump era will require a more radical strategy—and a bigger target.

The justices just took up a challenge to a Hawaii law that bars people from carrying guns on private property against the owner’s wishes.

A recent ruling takes a hammer to our constitutional order and empowers Trump above all else—including Congress.

The Supreme Court has saved Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook’s job—for now.

The Roberts court has unerringly sided against anyone seeking to curb political corruption, and it would be a shock if it decided to switch sides now.

The Supreme Court associate justice said that past rulings aren’t “gospel.”