The justice recently contended against the notion that the court has become a rubber stamp for Trump. She’s not wrong—but that’s just part of the story.

Donald Trump is refusing to just accept the L here.

These are the ingredients that have set up a major Supreme Court case about excessive fines that could shape the future of criminal asset forfeiture across the United States.

The high court’s decision in Landor v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections and Public Safety could incapacitate the legislative branch’s policymaking powers.

Why the hell is John Fetterman accepting money from a Nazi memorabilia collector?

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission is tasked with helping state and local officials run elections.

The extremist jurist’s dissent in the birthright citizenship case could in theory kick the door open to a future reconsideration—ready?—of Brown v. Board.

First the Supreme Court, then a judge, and now this.

Donald Trump claimed his petition for rehearing was “pending” before the Supreme Court.

In ruling after ruling, the Supreme Court justice has penned separate opinions to push for an expansion of executive power beyond what his conservative colleagues support.

A new report from Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission makes clear that this issue is just a stalking horse for a much broader political project to transform America.

Mike Johnson is now floating a “legislative fix” to birthright citizenship. That’s an assault on the Constitution—and a vote that vulnerable Republicans will hate, if recent polling from Fox News is any indication.

In the high court’s latest term, the chief practitioners of this purportedly neutral doctrine had a hard time keeping their stories straight.

The conservative legal movement lost its bid to eradicate birthright citizenship, but its war on the Reconstruction Amendments is going to continue.

His 10-page opinion is strangely adrift from rhyme or reason, and it ends up reinforcing a far more extreme position than any of his colleagues’.

With the Supreme Court allowing the end of Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians, national and local economies could feel the sting.

The high court ordered Donald Trump to pay Carroll what he owes her.

Miller is not happy with how the Supreme Court upheld the Constitution.

The first lady appeared to defend trans people.

One possible, overlooked implication of the Supreme Court’s finance ruling would be giving political parties an advantage over PACs when it comes to political spending.