Elon Musk Is Backing the Shadiest GOP Dark Money Group This Election

Elon Musk is playing Jewish and Arab American voters against each other.

The tech billionaire is funding a super PAC, Future Coalition PAC, that is running digital ads that tout Kamala Harris’s support for Israel in Michigan, in areas heavily populated with Muslim and Arab voters. At the same time, the super PAC is running ads aimed at Jewish voters in Pennsylvania attacking Harris as promoting anti-Israel policies, HuffPost reports.

One of the ads in Michigan touts Harris and the Jewish identity of her husband, Doug Emhoff, calling them “America’s pro-Israel power couple,” and mentions Israel’s “noble fight against the terrorists in Gaza.” A mailer paid for by the group also states that Harris leans on her “Jewish husband” to craft her policies on Israel. The ads’s focus on Emhoff to bolster a pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian message has been called antisemitic by Jewish Democrats.

Meanwhile, the super PAC’s ads in Pennsylvania send the opposite message, asking, for example, “Why did Kamala Harris support denying Israel the weapons needed to defeat the Hamas terrorists who massacred thousands? And why did Harris show sympathy for college protesters who are rabidly antisemitic?”

The aim of the two ads is to try to use the crisis in Gaza  to undermine Harris’s support from two major communities in key battleground states.

The New York Times confirmed Tuesday, shortly before FEC filings became public, that Building America’s Future is the dark money group behind the PAC. And The Wall Street Journal had already reported that Musk is one of the group’s major contributors. The tech CEO has pushed antisemitic conspiracy theories on his social media platform, X, and curried favor with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to deflect criticism.

The super PAC’s ads may prove to be effective with many Muslim and Arab American voters frustrated with President Biden and Harris’s stance over Israel’s brutal war in the Middle East, which has killed 42,000 Palestinians in Gaza and has expanded to include Lebanon. The Democratic National Convention snubbed opponents of Israel’s actions and refused to feature any Palestinian speakers. The Harris campaign has also refused to signal any change in U.S. policy toward Israel and Palestine. 

For weeks, Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance has skirted and dodged answering whether he believes that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election. But on Wednesday, Vance offered his most eyebrow-raising take thus far: “Not by the words that I would use.”

Speaking before a crowd in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, the MAGA movement’s second-in-command insisted that he had already answered the question when it was posed to him in dozens of previous interviews. In a word-salad reply, Vance refused to yield to the idea that Trump had not secured the presidency in 2020—but he also suggested that Trump may not have lost at all.

“I think there were serious problems in 2020. So did Donald Trump lose the election? Not by the words that I would use,” Vance said.

Vance isn’t the only MAGA ally still holding out on the 2020 election results in the waning days of the 2024 race. Speaking with NBC News’s Meet the Press on Sunday, House Speaker Mike Johnson couldn’t help but qualify his answer as to whether he would certify the results of the upcoming election no matter the outcome.

“Regardless of who wins, you’ll certify the results?” asked host Kristen Welker.

“Regardless? Of course, yes, if the election is free and fair and legal, and we pray and hope that it is, there’s a lot of work being done to make sure that’s true,” Johnson said. “I think this one’s going to be so large there’ll be no question. I think Donald J. Trump is your next president, and that can’t happen soon enough.”

When Welker pointed out that saying “if” the election is fair, as well as Trump’s continued lack of a concession over the 2020 vote, was likely to undermine voter confidence in the upcoming election, Johnson was quick to brush off her concerns.

“The point is the process works. We have the peaceful transfer of power. We did in 2020,” he said, conveniently ignoring the fact that an armed and violent mob stormed the Capitol to try to prevent that transfer of power.

Loyalty, after all, has a premium in any future Trump administration.

Pennsylvania Democrats are sounding the alarm that Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign may be mismanaged, Politico reported Wednesday. 

“I feel like we’re going to win here, but we’re going to win it in spite of the Harris state campaign,” said a Democratic elected official in the state, who, like others for this story, was granted anonymity to speak freely about a sensitive matter. “Pennsylvania is such a mess, and it’s incredibly frustrating.”

Specifically, it seems that Pennsylvania Democratic leaders are worried about the efforts of one person in particular: Nikki Lu, Harris’s campaign manager in the state.

Ryan Boyer, the first Black leader of Philadelphia’s powerful building trade council, spoke on the record about his worries over the campaign management. “I have concerns about Nikki Lu,” Boyer told Politico. “I don’t think she understands Philadelphia.”

Others criticized Lu for failing to connect with state Democratic leaders. A second Democratic state official described Lu as “AWOL,” while a Pennsylvania Democratic strategist told Politico that Lu “empowers a culture” in Harris’s presidential camp that has left elected officials feeling left out in the cold. 

Late last month, Latino and Black Democratic leaders met with officials from the Harris campaign to discuss their concerns, according to five people who attended or were briefed on the proceedings. Officials asked for increased presence at local events, improved surrogate operation, and a more sophisticated approach for engaging with diverse voting blocs. 

Harris’s national campaign manager Julie Rodriguez Chavez responded to criticism of Harris’s Pennsylvania campaign, saying that they were running “the largest and most sophisticated operation in Pennsylvania history.” 

“We have 50 coordinated offices and nearly 400 staff on the ground,” she said, touting the large investments the campaign has made in advertising  and outreach targeting Black and Latino voters. Both presidential campaigns have spent more in Pennsylvania than in any other state in the country. 

In recent weeks, Harris’s campaign has been joined by Paulette Aniskoff, who served as a field director for Barack Obama in 2008. Democratic leaders have been enthusiastic about Aniskoff’s presence and what they view as a softening of Lu’s authority in the campaign. Leaders were also encouraged by the work of two advisers, Brendan McPhillips and Kellan White, whom they saw as having a strong understanding of Philadelphia voters. 

While Harris needs to shore up support in Democratic-leaning Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and the surrounding suburbs, the vice president’s campaign has devoted significant resources toward attracting disaffected Republican voters throughout the state. 

Aniskoff seems all for it. “I do think these suburban folks—Nikki Haley folks—are very uncomfortable with Trump, uncomfortable with all of his crazy shit, and we have such a great opening,” she said. 

Unsurprisingly, that seems to involve cavorting with Republicans, which could explain why Democratic leaders appear to feel a little iced out. 

On Wednesday, Harris spoke in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, where she was joined by former Georgia Republican Lieutenant Governor Jeff Duncan, as well as Olivia Troye, former Homeland Security adviser to Mike Pence. Troye previously spoke at the Democratic National Convention and was Harris’s guest at her presidential debate in September. 

Harris held a rally in Erie, Pennsylvania, on Monday, where she called Trump “increasingly unstable and unhinged.” Both Erie and Bucks County supported President Joe Biden in 2020. 

The Nebraska Supreme Court has delivered a last-minute ruling that could impact one of the most important Senate races this November and one crucial Electoral College vote.

On Wednesday, a judge ruled that Nebraskans with past felony convictions can vote in the November elections and cannot be barred by county elections officials. Individuals with felony convictions in that state can register online through Friday or in person by October 25.

This comes as the Cornhusker State has garnered national attention over its exciting Senate matchup between independent Dan Osborn and Republican Deb Fischer, who are currently neck and neck in the polls.

Further, Nebraska’s particular split-electoral-vote system, which Republicans tried to challenge earlier this year, means that the blue dot of Omaha could be Kamala Harris’s key to winning in November. 

Nearly 7,000 voters could now be eligible to vote in less than three weeks. Many of Nebraska’s former felons live in or near Omaha. The overlapping 2nd congressional district race between Republican Don Bacon and Democrat Tony Vargas is also too close to call.

For the past 20 years, Nebraskans with past felony convictions were forced to wait two years before registering to vote, until legislation passed this April ending the waiting period. Voters were held in limbo after the Nebraska attorney general challenged the decision. Wednesday’s ruling sets the record straight. And these new voters may just determine the future of the White House, Congress, and the Senate—if they can register to vote in time.

Donald Trump had no idea what in vitro fertilization was until after Alabama’s Supreme Court ruling against the practice in February, needing Senator Katie Britt to explain it to him.

The former president made the startling revelation during a Fox News town hall in Georgia about women’s issues that aired Wednesday, shortly after calling himself the “father of IVF” and saying, “Nobody talks about that.”

“I got a call from Katie Britt, a young, just a fantastically attractive person from Alabama, she’s a senator, and she called me up like ‘Emergency, emergency’ because an Alabama judge had ruled that the IVF clinics were illegal and had to be closed down,” Trump told Fox News’s Harris Faulkner.

“I didn’t know they were even involved in [IVF]; nobody talks about that, they don’t talk about it, but now that they can’t do it, she said I was attacked in a certain way, I was attacked, and I said explain IVF very quickly, and within about two minutes I understood it. I said, ‘No no, we’re totally in favor of IVF,’” Trump continued incoherently.

Trump admitting he had never heard of IVF until February would be damning for most political candidates, let alone one running for president. Trump’s supposed vow to protect IVF is even worse, as he has constantly flip-flopped on the issue, with his running mate, JD Vance, struggling to keep up and explain Trump’s policy.

Trump’s fellow Republicans, including Britt, have refused to protect the practice at the federal level, voting against multiple measures in Congress. But so far, Trump and the GOP have escaped any blowback for failing to protect IVF or their numerous other attacks on reproductive rights. It looks like the only accountability they’ll face will be at the ballot box in November.