Trump Campaign Manager’s Brutal Past Criticism of Trump Exposed

Donald Trump’s campaign manager Chris LaCivita can’t come up with a good explanation for all his posts after the January 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection, blaming Trump for the violence of that day.

In the immediate aftermath of the riots, several Republicans criticized Trump for fueling the protesters violently attempting to disrupt the certification of the 2020 election. Chris LaCivita was among them, sharing comments on X (Twitter at the time) calling January 6 an insurrection fueled by Trump’s lies about the election, CNN reports. 

LaCivita shared several reposts condemning Trump for January 6, including former President George W. Bush’s statement expressing “disbelief and dismay” and calling the unrest at the Capitol “a sickening and heartbreaking sight.” LaCivita later deleted this post, along with several others, but CNN’s Andrew Kaczynski was able to find them on the Internet Archive Wayback Machine.

CNN also saw a video of a screen recording showing that LaCivita liked a post from former Republican Representative Barbara Comstock, who called for Trump’s Cabinet to invoke the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to the Constitution and remove him from office.

“Twitter locked @realDonaldTrump for 12 hours. Now the Cabinet needs to lock him down for the next 14 days. #25thAmendmentNow,” Comstock’s post on the evening of January 6 read.

LaCivita also shared a post from a Republican Senate aide, John McCormack, who at the time was a reporter for the conservative magazine National Review.

“Text message from a GOP Senate aide: ‘This is a disgusting tragedy. Someone literally lost their life because of a lie that Trump told, Cruz/Hawley capitalized on, and fringe media echoed. This is in no way shape or form sustainable,’” McCormack’s post read, referring to Senators Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley, who were supporting Trump’s claim that he hadn’t lost the election.

LaCivita also reposted, and later deleted, a comment from a Republican political staffer calling the people who stormed the Capitol “thugs,” quoting a tweet from CNN about the breach of the Capitol.

Trump’s campaign manager didn’t deny making the posts and reposts in a statement to CNN but said, “Retweets and likes are not endorsements.

“I’m focused on winning the election two weeks from now, and not distractions from CNN,” his statement read.

All of his posts show that LaCivita, like many other Republicans, saw the Capitol riots as very damaging for the country and the GOP. But today, these criticisms have been memory-holed, as the Republican Party and Trump’s fervent supporters have sought to downplay, whitewash, and even defend the events of January 6.

Along with 2020 election denial, ignoring the riots has even become a litmus test of supporting Trump in his campaign for president. With the 2024 election only days away, how will LaCivita and the rest of Trump’s campaign react if there’s another violent attempt to overturn the election?

Former White House national security adviser John Bolton doesn’t agree that Donald Trump is a “fascist”—but only because he’s not as “capable” as some of history’s greatest villains.

During an interview with CNN’s The Source on Tuesday, Bolton pushed back on recent comments made by Trump’s former chief of staff John Kelly, who said that Trump fit the definition of a fascist.

“Certainly the former president is in the far-right area, he’s certainly an authoritarian, admires people who are dictators—he has said that. So he certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure,” Kelly, a retired military general, said. “He certainly prefers the dictator approach to government.”

Bolton, in turn, described Trump’s behavior as “troubling” but not thoughtful enough to constitute a legitimate philosophy.

“I think it’s a mistake to get into a controversy over whether Trump meets the definition of fascist or not,” Bolton told CNN.

“I think his behavior alone is troubling enough,” he continued. “To be a fascist, you have to have a philosophy. Trump’s not capable of that.”

Bolton, who also served in Ronald Reagan’s administration, then went on to drag Trump’s mental fortitude, claiming that the MAGA leader could never flesh out his movement like Hitler due to his alleged inability to finish a book.

“You know, Adolf Hitler wrote a profoundly troubling book called Mein Kampf, ‘My Struggle.’ Donald Trump couldn’t even read his way all the way through that book, let alone write something like it,” Bolton argued.

“I’m not trying to understate the dangers of a Trump presidency. I think it’s important to focus on the dangers themselves.”

The Republican presidential nominee and his former foreign policy hawk have publicly butted heads several times since Bolton was ousted from Trump’s administration in 2019. Over the last year, the ex-ally has relentlessly grilled Trump for wanting to pull out of NATO. In February, Bolton claimed that Trump had completely fabricated a story in which he allegedly told a European leader that he’d allow Russia to “do whatever the hell they want” to NATO allies if they didn’t “pay” their “bills.”

Both candidates in the presidential race are after the young male vote—but getting the demographic to side with Donald Trump is apparently a lot trickier than capturing key endorsements from characters such as Elon Musk.

A new poll by Democratic pollster Blueprint 2024 that surveyed young men between the ages of 18 and 29 across the nation found that Musk’s endorsement had actually done more harm than good for the Republican presidential nominee.

Roughly 70 percent of male voters were aware that Musk had endorsed the former president shortly after Trump survived an assassination attempt near Butler, Pennsylvania, in July. And while 24 percent of the men surveyed said that Musk’s endorsement skewed their perspective toward Trump in a positive way, slightly more—28 percent—said it actually made them less likely to support Trump, according to the poll. Approximately 45 percent of respondents said Musk’s stance on Trump had no impact on their opinion.

That’s despite the fact that Musk has gone deliberately out of his way to court young men for the MAGA leader’s cause. Through his Trump-focused America PAC, Musk has effectively promised a political bribe, offering to raffle away $1 million to one registered swing state voter per day, every day until Election Day.

“We want to try to get over a million, maybe two million voters in the battleground states to sign the petition in support of the First and Second Amendment.… We are going to be awarding $1 million randomly to people who have signed the petition, every day, from now until the election,” Musk said last week.

Democrats have roundly criticized the initiative, with Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro describing Musk’s initiative as “deeply concerning” and “something that law enforcement should take a look at.”

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez chimed in on the issue at a Democratic event on Sunday, arguing that “Elon Musk thinks your vote can be bought.”

McDonald’s share price just hit its lowest point since Covid. It might not be completely Donald Trump’s fault—but we can’t say that he helped at all.

After Trump’s desperate stunt at the fast-food franchise on Sunday afternoon, McDonald’s suffered a double blow to the golden arches brand. On Tuesday, news broke that an E. coli outbreak related to McDonald’s Quarter Pounders is spreading in multiple states (notably not yet in Pennsylvania, where Trump held his staged photo op).

One person has died from the outbreak, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and hospitalizations have been reported across 10 states.

In response to the double whammy, McDonald’s stock, which began dropping the day after Trump’s visit, is down 19 percent on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, Trump Media stock continues to fluctuate and even surge, despite the company appearing to fall apart at the seams after hitting a new low last month. Experts say that the share price is less of a measure of the health of the business, which again is not good, and more “a barometer for both Trump and Trump’s followers,” Kristi Marvin, a former investment banker, told The New York Times. “This stock has never traded on fundamentals.”

Trump’s media company continues to lose tens of millions each quarter, and senior management are dropping like flies, despite the stock fluctuations. For a comparison to demonstrate just how much of a failure Trump’s company is, let’s put it into perspective: Trump Media’s quarterly revenue is less than that of a single McDonald’s franchise.

While McDonald’s stock will probably rebound, if investors can begin to see clearly, Trump’s businesses may not be so lucky.

Donald Trump may be teeing up to reward Judge Aileen Cannon for tossing out his classified documents case with a new gig as attorney general.

Cannon dismissed the 42 felony charges against the former president in July, ruling that special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment to the case was unconstitutional. Her unprecedented finding has been criticized by legal scholars, and Smith has appealed Cannon’s decision.

Now it appears that she’s being considered for a top spot in a potential second Trump administration. Her name appeared on a list obtained by ABC News, titled, “Transition Planning: Legal Principals.”

The document was drafted by some of the Trump campaign’s senior advisers, including Boris Epshteyn, the Trump team’s top lawyer. Epshteyn was accused of assisting Rudy Giuliani’s fake electors scheme in Arizona and obstructing the certification of the 2020 election result. He pleaded not guilty, but the case is still ongoing.

The transition document included nearly a dozen potential candidates for attorney general, and Cannon’s name appeared second after Trump-appointed Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Jay Clayton, according to ABC. Clayton was Trump’s pick to become the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York in 2020.

Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance has previously said that the attorney general would be the second-most important person in the Trump administration.

“We really want the American people to believe we have a fair and equitable administration of justice, if not the entire sort of system falls apart,” Vance said earlier this month. While Vance dismissed Trump’s statements promising to prosecute his political enemies, that seems to be part of the plan.

Far-right pro-Trump activists like Tim Pool and Laura Loomer have been hoping Trump will install a staunch MAGA loyalist as attorney general, so that the Trump administration can carry out the former president’s revenge fantasy to see his supposedly treasonous political opponents tried by the U.S. government and imprisoned. Loomer even wants them put to death.

If Cannon’s actions to defend Trump and delay his classified documents trial are anything to go by, she could be exactly the loyalist Trump is searching for.

Trump’s former chief of staff is sounding the alarm about Donald Trump threatening to use the military against his opponents, saying that the former president is a “fascist” who would govern like a dictator.

Retired General John Kelly spoke to The New York Times for an article published Tuesday about his fears that Trump would disregard the Constitution and the rule of law if elected president, confirming that Trump has praised Adolf Hitler on different occasions and put down disabled veterans.

During the interview, when asked if Trump was a fascist, Kelly read a definition of fascism from the internet, and said that Trump definitely prefers that philosophy.

“Certainly the former president is in the far-right area, he’s certainly an authoritarian, admires people who are dictators—he has said that. So he certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure,” Kelly said. “He certainly prefers the dictator approach to government.”

Kelly said that after he left the White House in 2019, he decided that he would only speak out publicly if Trump spoke inaccurately about him, or said something egregious. The former chief of staff said that Trump’s comments about using the military against “the enemy within” fit those criteria.

“And I think this issue of using the military on—to go after—American citizens is one of those things I think is a very, very bad thing—even to say it for political purposes to get elected—I think it’s a very, very bad thing, let alone actually doing it,” said Kelly.

Trump thinks that personal loyalty is more important than loyalty to the Constitution, Kelly told the Times, and he couldn’t understand why aides and military leaders weren’t loyal to him above everything else.

“That was a big surprise to him that the generals were not loyal to the boss, in this case him, “ Kelly said.

The fact that a senior White House official is coming out vehemently against Trump in late October, only weeks away from the election, is a stark warning for the country. Kelly clearly fears what would happen if the former president and convicted felon would return to the White House and take revenge for slights real and imagined. The question is whether these fears will make a difference to voters.

From the waning days of Donald Trump’s administration and beyond, the former president has been obsessed with the executive advantages of dictatorship.

A new report by The Atlantic found that, in private, Trump had openly praised the authoritarian setup of some of history’s greatest villains, including Adolf Hitler.

“I need the kind of generals that Hitler had,” Trump said in a private conversation in the White House, according to two sources that spoke anonymously with The Atlantic. “People who were totally loyal to him, that follow orders.”

While in a frustrated discussion with then–Chief of Staff John Kelly, a former Marine general, Trump reportedly asked, “Why can’t you be like the German generals?” forgetting that Hitler’s top generals had themselves defied him and made several attempts toward the end of World War II to kill him. Kelly, trying to correct the president, informed him that German generals “tried to kill Hitler three times and almost pulled it off.”

But Trump wouldn’t hear of it. “No, no, no, they were totally loyal to him,” the president responded, according to Peter Baker and Susan Glasser’s 2022 book, The Divider: Trump in the White House, 2017-2021.

When asked by The Atlantic about the exchange for the story published Tuesday, Kelly recalled that when Trump had raised the matter of “German generals,” Kelly responded by asking, “Do you mean Bismarck’s generals?”

“I mean, I knew he didn’t know who Bismarck was, or about the Franco-Prussian War. I said, ‘Do you mean the kaiser’s generals? Surely you can’t mean Hitler’s generals?’” Kelly told The Atlantic. “And he said, ‘Yeah, yeah, Hitler’s generals.’ I explained to him that Rommel had to commit suicide after taking part in a plot against Hitler.”

But Trump did not know who Rommel was, either.

During the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, Trump complained several times that the U.S. military wasn’t as draconian as the Chinese. “The Chinese Generals would know what to do,” he said in private conversations, referring to the Tiananmen Square massacre, sources told The Atlantic.

Meanwhile, Trump has spent months expressing outward disdain for Americans who actually served in the military. In August, the former president drew the ire of the Army after he was caught red-handed filming video in Section 60 of Arlington National Cemetery, where recent military casualties are buried. Trump’s campaign staffers reportedly launched into a verbal and physical fight with cemetery officials, who had asked the campaign to stop videotaping. Federal law prohibits politically related activities in the cemetery, including taking photos and videos in support of a political campaign.

Earlier that month, the reputed Vietnam-era draft dodger came under additional fire for arguing that the Presidential Medal of Freedom he awarded to one of his billionaire donors was “much better” than the nation’s highest military honor, the Medal of Honor. That comment rubbed veterans the wrong way, who connected Trump’s disrespectful rhetoric to a 2020 Atlantic report that caught the former president repeatedly referring to fallen soldiers as “suckers and losers.”

And Trump’s attempts to cover his flailing image have been thoroughly undercut by his own actions. After offering in front of TV cameras to help personally pay for the funeral of Vanessa Guillén, a 20-year-old Army private who was beaten to death by a fellow soldier at Fort Hood, Trump reportedly complained to his then–Chief of Staff Mark Meadows about the cost of the burial.

“It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a fucking Mexican,” Trump reportedly said, ordering Meadows not to pay it. Natalie Khawam, the Guillén family’s attorney, confirmed to The Atlantic that she had sent the funeral receipt to the White House following Trump’s offer but that the family had never received funds from him.

After Senator John McCain died in 2018, Trump reportedly told aides that they were “not going to support that loser’s funeral” and was irate that the White House had lowered its flags to half-mast in honor of the war hero. “What the fuck are we doing that for? Guy was a fucking loser,” he said, according to The Atlantic.

Donald Trump’s cronies are already making plans to overturn North Carolina’s election results if a majority of the state’s voters choose Kamala Harris for president.

Ivan Raiklin, a supporter of the former president who calls himself Trump’s future “secretary of retribution,” has prepared a plan to deliver North Carolina’s 16 electoral votes to Trump, regardless of how the votes go. Raiklin, an attorney and military veteran, has close ties to people in Trump’s inner circle, including Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser who was pardoned by the former president. 

Raiklin told his plan to an audience at the Christian nationalist ReAwaken America Tour over the weekend in Selma, North Carolina, after being introduced by Flynn, according to Rolling Stone. Raiklin claimed that Hurricane Helene’s devastation may hurt Republican turnout in the state and give Democrats the edge on November 5, so he asked the crowd to pressure the state’s Republican leadership to ignore a favorable Democratic result.

Specifically, the leaders he mentioned were North Carolina state House Speaker Tim Moore and embattled Lieutenant Governor Mark Robinson, who presides over the state Senate. Raiklin’s plan involves the state legislature reacting quickly in January 2025 before the election results are certified by Congress, but only if Trump loses.

“If it’s legit, we don’t have to worry, right?” Raiklin told the partisan audience. “But who thinks it’s going to be legit? You think they’re just going to give it to you? No, there’s going to be a fight!”

Raiklin told the crowd to “apply the necessary motivation” to the state’s Republicans, who control both houses of the legislature, by telling the senators and representatives that “they have the political obligation to remedy an illegitimate election.”

In Raiklin’s mind, this process, which he said is “the only way … we can address” the “calamity in western North Carolina” in a “legal, moral, ethical manner under our Constitution,” would be livestreamed on Rumble and Elon Musk’s X, adding that he hoped the “radical left media” would “start to cry.”

Raiklin’s plan is far-fetched, but not far off from the many fake-elector schemes attempted after Trump lost the 2020 presidential election. While each one of those was thwarted, Raiklin’s cryptic language could incite MAGA-aligned protesters to attempt to force the state’s legislature to overturn a possible Democratic victory, which could turn into a mini-January 6. It all depends on whether Raiklin’s half-baked plan garners any support, or if he’s exposed as a blustering troll.

A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Army to release all of its records related to Donald Trump’s controversial visit to Arlington National Cemetery in August.

American Oversight, a nonprofit organization dedicated to government transparency, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia asking for the records to be made public under the Freedom of Information Act.

Senior Judge Paul Friedman granted the group’s request, which asked for “any report—including, but not limited to, an incident report filed with U.S. Army Military Police Corps officials and/or any other military officials at Arlington National Cemetery—regarding the alleged incident reported to have taken place during the August 26, 2024, visit by former President Trump to Arlington National Cemetery.”

On August 26, Trump visited the cemetery to attend a wreath-laying ceremony for 13 U.S. service members who were killed in an attack at Kabul’s airport during the U.S. evacuation of Afghanistan three years before. After the event concluded, Trump campaign staff recorded the former president smiling and giving a thumbs-up sign next to military graves, footage of which was later used in campaign ads.

When a cemetery employee tried to stop the campaign from taking photos or video, as such political activity is illegal, they were physically shoved by a Trump staffer. The employee opted not to press charges against the staffer, and wished to remain anonymous out of fear of retaliation from Trump’s supporters. Trump, meanwhile, denied any wrongdoing. His campaign said it would release footage that would show that no laws were broken, but to date has not.

The judge gave the Army an October 25 deadline to release the requested records. Such material could prove damaging and embarrassing to the former president, possibly showing how the physical altercation was instigated and how Trump reacted to it. With the election only weeks away and Trump already having a poor reputation with military veterans, the former president is probably hoping no one pays attention when the truth finally comes out.

A federal judge has declared that Rudy Giuliani must hand over his most valuable possessions in just seven days to the Georgia election workers he defamed.

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman ordered Giuliani to relinquish his possessions, including his Manhattan penthouse, to the mother-daughter duo Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. Since winning their defamation lawsuit against the former New York mayor and Donald Trump attorney last year, the pair have been waiting for Giuliani to pay up the $148 million judgment.

Giuliani was convicted last year of defaming Freeman and Moss, and inflicting emotional and reputational harm, in spreading lies that they tampered with ballots while working the polls in 2020.

After Giuliani failed to declare bankruptcy and still evaded accountability, the judge’s order Tuesday means that the election workers will finally have justice (and all of Giuliani’s prized assets) in just a week’s time. Some of that stuff may include: around two dozen watches (including a commemorative 9/11 watch), a signed Joe DiMaggio jersey, and a 1980 Mercedes.

This comes as just another blow for Giuliani, who formally lost his license to practice law in September.

“Last December, a jury delivered a powerful verdict in their favor, and we’re proud that today’s ruling makes that verdict a reality,” said Aaron Nathan, a lawyer representing Freeman and Moss. “This outcome should send a powerful message that there is a price to pay for those who choose to intentionally spread disinformation.”

The mother-daughter duo will also be entitled to an estimated $2 million in legal fees that Giuliani says Trump still owes him. One of Giuliani’s biggest assets is still up in the air: his Palm Beach, Florida,  condominium. 

While the judge has scheduled a hearing for Monday about Giuliani’s condo, it’s unclear how the former Trump lawyer will shake down the Republican nominee for the legal fees he’s owed.

This story has been updated.