Breaking News
Breaking News
from Washington and beyond

Every Democrat Who Voted Against Impeaching Trump

Eighteen Democrats joined Republicans to kill the measure.

Donald Trump points on stage after addressing attendees on the first day of the 2026 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

House Democrats launched another hail Mary bid to impeach President Donald Trump, but the effort was undercut by members of their own party.

More than a dozen Democrats joined 213 Republicans in voting “no” Tuesday night. Another 46 Democrats simply voted “present,” including some of the lower chamber’s biggest names: Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Minority Whip Katherine Clark, and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar.

It was the third time in two years that the liberal party has tried to oust Trump from the Oval Office, but the proposal—introduced by Texas Representative Al Green—did not receive support from party leadership before Green forced the vote. One Democrat described the situation to Axios as “fucked up,” while others derided the effort as a distraction, with the spectre of midterms mere weeks away.

“Impeachment is a sacred constitutional vehicle designed to hold a corrupt executive accountable for abuse of power, breaking the law and violating the public trust,” Jeffries, Clark, and Aguilar wrote in a joint statement Monday. “The effort traditionally requires a comprehensive investigative process.”

Green, who cited the various deaths caused by federal immigration agents as his rationale for impeachment, described the vote as a “life and death” matter. He initially filed the articles in August.

Eighteen Democrats ultimately voted against impeaching Trump. They are:

  1. Kathy Castor (Florida)
  2. Emanuel Cleaver (Missouri)
  3. James Clyburn (South Carolina)
  4. Henry Cuellar (Texas)
  5. Don Davis (North Carolina)
  6. Shomari Figures (Alabama)
  7. Laura Gillen (New York)
  8. Jared Golden (Maine)
  9. Adam Gray (California)
  10. Rick Larsen (Washington)
  11. Susie Lee (Nevada)
  12. Kristen McDonald Rivet (Michigan)
  13. Jared Moskowitz (Florida)
  14. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Washington)
  15. Josh Riley (New York)
  16. Hillary Scholten (Michigan)
  17. Darren Soto (Florida)
  18. Tom Suozzi (New York)

House Votes for Third Time to End Iran War Thanks to 7 Republicans

Seven Republicans joined all Democrats to try to stop Donald Trump’s war of choice.

Donald Trump holds his hands out to the side while speaking on stage during the Republican midterm convention
Alex Wong/Getty Images

For the third time, the House of Representatives said “no” to President Donald Trump’s war with Iran. Seven Republicans voted with Democrats to end the conflict.

The Tuesday night vote, which will probably be the last anti-war resolution before the midterm elections in November, passed 220-204, with eight Republicans and one Democrat not voting.

Three Republicans voted against the war for the first time: Representatives Nancy Mace, Mariannette Miller-Meeks, and Zach Nunn. They joined Tom Barrett, Brian Fitzpatrick, Warren Davidson, and Thomas Massie, who voted for the previous resolutions opposing the war.

“I will not support another open-ended war. We can defend Americans, pressure Iran, and pursue peace while ensuring Congress fulfills its constitutional responsibility,” Nunn said in a post on X.

Later this week, Democrats will attempt to pass the resolution in the Senate. The last time they tried in June, Trump showed up on Capitol Hill and yelled at Republican Senator Bill Cassidy for breaking ranks and voting to end the war. Cassidy ended up flip-flopping, changing his vote, and sinking the resolution.

This time, with the midterms less than two months away, will Senate Republicans try to take a stand? Trump and the GOP are historically unpopular, with the expensive war sending gas prices skyrocketing and continuing to damage the global economy. Congress has the constitutional authority to end the war and bring relief to the American people. Do Republicans have the courage?

“Investigating What?”: Todd Blanche Brushes Off Trump Jr.’s Wedding

A Russian oligarch with close ties to Vladimir Putin bankrolled Donald Trump Jr.’s wedding.

Attorney General Todd Blanche looks to the side while standing in the White House Rose Garden
Aaron Schwartz/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Attorney General Todd Blanche won’t examine the Russian ties to Donald Trump Jr.

Umar Kremlev, a Russian oligarch, spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to make Trump’s lavish destination wedding a reality, ProPublica reported Monday.

The expenses footed by Kremlev included a $100,000 nightly rental of a private island in the Bahamas, as well as an estimated $70,000 fireworks display. Kremlev’s team also assisted Trump in coordinating the evening.

Kremlev isn’t just anybody in Russian politics. He’s a close ally to President Vladimir Putin, and his decision to shoulder a huge portion of the wedding placed him within degrees of President Donald Trump’s orbit. Kremlev also attended the wedding reception, alongside a cadre of Russian guests.

But none of that is of any interest to Blanche, who shrugged off the concerning connection at the White House Tuesday.

“So I—the president’s already talked about it,” Blanche said dismissively when asked by a reporter whether the Justice Department would examine Trump’s relationship with Kremlev.

“The president’s son has said that he’s a very close friend, and that he accepted a gift on the weekend of his wedding,” Blanche said. “So I don’t—I’m not sure when you say, ‘Am I investigating’—am I investigating what?

“And when you say, ‘This person is a friend of Putin,’ I don’t even know if that’s true or not,” continued America’s attorney general—the country’s chief law enforcement officer. “I don’t know this person either, I don’t have any information about it.”

Mere weeks before the late-May wedding, Putin personally awarded Kremlev Russia’s Order of Friendship, recognizing Kremlev’s ability to improve international cooperation with Russia via his involvement with the International Boxing Association.

The IBA is, in its own right, riddled with scandal. ProPublica reported that the entity was financed by the Russian state-owned oil company Gazprom and that the wedding payments originated from an IBA-affiliated entity in Dubai.

Kremlev—a towering, bald-headed man who speaks little English—stood out like a sore thumb at the party, according to insiders who spoke with ProPublica. About 18 people participated in the wedding ceremony (which Kremlev did not attend, per his spokesman), while roughly 50 people (including Kremlev and multiple other Russians) attended the intimate reception. Those that spoke with ProPublica said Kremlev and his associates mostly stuck to themselves, speaking Russian.

Yet Trump Jr. explained on his podcast that the whole event was “really small” and made up of “close friends.”

“Tried to keep it really tight. And it was just awesome,” he said.

That would suggest Trump Jr. had either developed a close tie to a Putin ally or had unwittingly invited one to his own wedding.

Kremlev’s press office told ProPublica that the two men have a “friendly relationship” and first met “a couple of years ago.” Yet even Trump Jr.’s younger brother Eric Trump was completely unaware of Kremlev’s identity.

“Eric has absolutely no clue who this person is, nor has never heard his name,” a spokesperson for Eric told ProPublica.

Trump Throws “F—king Crazy” Tantrum at Kennedy Center Meeting

The decision to close the Kennedy Center came after Trump personally called up the board to yell about his loss in court.

Tarp-covered scaffolding hides the front of the Kennedy Center
A tarp remains in place on the facade of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on August 25.
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
A tarp remains in place on the facade of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on August 25.

President Trump called into the Kennedy Center’s board of trustees meeting Tuesday to yell at trustee and Democratic Representative Joyce Beatty.

The call came in before the board voted to close the center indefinitely, ostensibly for repairs, and just after a federal judge blocked Trump from putting his name on the building or sneakily renaming the plaza near the building after himself.

An unnamed board member described Trump’s phone call as “fucking crazy” to CNN, while another source told the news outlet that Trump screamed throughout the call. Beatty, who is part of legal efforts to keep Trump’s name off of the building, told him that his efforts have left the venue underwater with debt.

Trump and the board, made up of mostly his handpicked appointees, insist that the center will collapse, physically and financially, if the president isn’t allowed to take over the center and put his name on it.

Hours after the court decision, Trump declared in a Truth Social post that the building would close “immediately” but that “Renovation and Reconstruction, which is a very large and complex job, cannot begin until such time as the D.C. Circuit rules on the Board’s approved name.” He also claimed that he has already raised $17 million to put into the center.

Trump has repeatedly been told in federal court that he needs approval from Congress to make his desired changes to the center, which should theoretically be easy with Republicans currently controlling the House and Senate. But he refuses to listen to those rulings and wants to forcibly take over the venue, with intervention from the Supreme Court if necessary, even though his involvement has killed the center’s ticket sales and fundraising while pushing away performers.

Photographer Exposes Kash Patel’s Talking Points—and They’re a Doozy

The FBI director came prepared, but not to talk about his actual job.

FBI Director Kash Patel holds up both hands while testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee
FBI Director Kash Patel testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Win McNamee/Getty Images
FBI Director Kash Patel testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

FBI Director Kash Patel needed a cheat sheet of attacks in order to dodge tough questions from Senator Dick Durbin Tuesday.

It’s no wonder Patel refused to answer Democratic lawmakers’ questions at a Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing—his notes had nothing to do with his role leading the FBI!

A Reuters photographer captured an image of a document Patel referred to during questioning. It was titled “DURBIN INFO” and listed a series of bullet points containing opposition research on Durbin and his wife.

Screenshot of a tweet
Screenshot

It’s a little ironic that Patel was planning to make things so personal, considering that the FBI director repeatedly refused to answer any questions involving his use of government resources for his 26-year-old girlfriend.

It appears that Patel didn’t get a chance to use his opposition research on the Illinois Democrat—instead, he offered a series of obstinate nonanswers.

Patel refused to provide information in response to Durbin’s questions about the FBI’s failure to investigate potential civil rights violations committed by federal agents during the Department of Homeland Security’s “Midway Blitz” operation in Chicago. Patel also denied making false statements following the horrific shooting of Marimar Martinez.

“I can tell you that she’s never been charged with a crime after being shot five times—” Durbin said.

“You want her to be charged for being shot?” Patel asked incredulously.

Patel responded incoherently to Durbin’s questions about lowering the standards for applicants at the FBI, claiming he’d done so in order to, among other things, protect the human “victims” of bestiality. He also dodged questions about dragging his feet on releasing documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, and refused to weigh in on the allegations of corruption against Corey Lewandowski.

There was once a time when government officials preparing to testify before the Senate might’ve brought notes on their work—but not anymore. In the Trump administration, officials mostly just prep tips on how to get at Democratic lawmakers. Former Attorney General Pam Bondi tried the same thing and, well, we all know how that went.