Republicans are looking to the justices to remove a key campaign finance restriction. Most of the court’s right-wing majority doesn’t seem to want to play along.

The Supreme Court justice asked how Elon Musk’s postelection role wasn’t quid pro quo.

The Roberts court is about to hand the president—and an untold number of financial predators—a massive win.

At oral arguments in the tariffs case, the conservative justices seemed ready to hit the president with the legal rationale they used to bedevil Joe Biden.

The court’s majority typically doesn’t disclose their reasoning on shadow docket cases. Here’s one instance where a justice may regret speaking their mind.

While the Roberts court has issued a trove of suspect decisions over the years, the one area of the law in which it’s been consistently virtuous is the First Amendment.

The Supreme Court justice has some thoughts on Bondi’s vow to crack down on “hate speech.”

Every liberal justice on the Supreme Court issued a scathing dissent in the decision to let ICE resume its racial-profiling tactics.

Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor torched the Supreme Court for siding with Trump on birthright citizenship—and putting every civil right under attack.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the Supreme Court was actually enabling censorship.

The Supreme Court determined parents can “opt out” of letting their children see LGBTQ books in the classroom.

The high court has dealt a savage blow to due process and has rewarded the administration for defying court orders.

While the court’s ruling was not as immediately disastrous as it might have been, it sets the stage for a parade of horribles in the years to come.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor accused the high court of abandoning “meaningful judicial review” by upholding Tennessee’s ban.

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a scathing disssent, called out the rest of the court for allowing Trump’s harmful executive order to stand.

The Trump administration’s brief against the Fourteenth Amendment is a bad one, and it naturally led to some tortured legal reasoning from his solicitor general.

As the Supreme Court starts weighing in on Trump’s deportations, a legal expert deciphers the complexities of these cases and shows how Sonia Sotomayor revealed the alarming stakes of this fraught moment.

As the Supreme Court begins ruling on Trump’s deportations, a legal expert unravels the complexities of all these cases and explains how Sonia Sotomayor laid bare the truly alarming stakes we currently face.

By blessing the president’s rampant abuse of the rule of law, the high court has guaranteed that we’ll be seeing more of it.

The high court’s 7-2 decision suggests broad agreement on a contentious issue. But if you read between the lines, there are fault lines everywhere.