The hot new electoral subversion idea brewed up by the conservative legal movement may be too extreme for some of the Supreme Court’s conservatives.

Who gets the final say on deportations and enforcement, Washington or the states? The high court faces some nettlesome questions—and some intriguing divisions.

A pair of death penalty decisions reaffirms a sad fact about the high court: There is a majority of justices who want to keep the executions coming.

Right-wing judicial hegemony presents a daunting challenge for liberal leaders—but not an insurmountable one.

Americans’ antipathy toward the high court is deepening—and for the first time, a slim majority favors expansion.

A trio of American Samoan plaintiffs are asking the high court to end their status as second-class citizens.

The justices consistently ruled against plaintiffs who had their constitutional rights violated—and, in some cases, their bodies abused—by police, the Border Patrol, and the CIA.

In their scathing dissent, the court’s minority write that their fellow justices have abandoned any claim to legitimacy.

The high court’s drive to radically redefine our Constitutional rights continues apace.

What recourse do ordinary citizens have when federal agents violate their rights? After Wednesday, not much.

The court’s conservatives have pared back the Sixth Amendment’s protections so that it won’t impede the state’s ability to erroneously execute the innocent.

The high court’s ruling in a 2020 case upended Oklahoma’s relationship with Indian country. Now the justices are considering an even bigger step.

The justice’s recent opinion takes a strong stance against the shameful way the United States has ruled over the territory.

The soon-to-retire justice lost his fight to abolish the death penalty. His courage keeps alive the possibility that some future court might yet win.

The high court’s decision in the matter of the Lone Star State’s controversial abortion law seems destined to spawn further chaos.

Wednesday’s oral arguments in a challenge of Mississippi’s abortion law reveal that a majority of justices want to gut abortion rights in America.

The public’s esteem of the high court is at an all-time low, and the media is not to blame.

In the dead of night, the Supreme Court’s conservatives erased abortion rights in Texas—and signaled what they would do next.

The Supreme Court will take up a case that bundles concerns over qualified immunity with a consequential First Amendment dispute.

Don’t be fooled by the burst of moderation from the justices this term.