Joe Kennedy’s phony tale of religious discrimination may have reached a predictable end this week, but it illuminated an important truth about the Supreme Court.

Critics of the liberal justices’ ethical lapses aren’t trying to make the case for reform—they’re trying to kill it.

The Supreme Court justice’s buckraking hardly compares to that of her conservative colleagues. But it still says a lot about how much Washington has changed.

The high court’s ruling on the nature of “transformative” works of art could have major ramifications for artists working today—as well as the A.I. enthusiasts looking toward tomorrow.

The high court will decide if free speech rights extend to inducing illegal immigration.

The high court’s most unusual case of the current term will determine if our trademark laws are all bark and no bite.

Technology has made it easier than ever to menace other people. Can police and prosecutors keep pace while preserving our First Amendment rights?

The Calvinball court is at it again with its recent Title 42 decision.

The hot new electoral subversion idea brewed up by the conservative legal movement may be too extreme for some of the Supreme Court’s conservatives.

Who gets the final say on deportations and enforcement, Washington or the states? The high court faces some nettlesome questions—and some intriguing divisions.

A pair of death penalty decisions reaffirms a sad fact about the high court: There is a majority of justices who want to keep the executions coming.

Right-wing judicial hegemony presents a daunting challenge for liberal leaders—but not an insurmountable one.

Americans’ antipathy toward the high court is deepening—and for the first time, a slim majority favors expansion.

A trio of American Samoan plaintiffs are asking the high court to end their status as second-class citizens.

The justices consistently ruled against plaintiffs who had their constitutional rights violated—and, in some cases, their bodies abused—by police, the Border Patrol, and the CIA.

In their scathing dissent, the court’s minority write that their fellow justices have abandoned any claim to legitimacy.

The high court’s drive to radically redefine our Constitutional rights continues apace.

What recourse do ordinary citizens have when federal agents violate their rights? After Wednesday, not much.

The court’s conservatives have pared back the Sixth Amendment’s protections so that it won’t impede the state’s ability to erroneously execute the innocent.

The high court’s ruling in a 2020 case upended Oklahoma’s relationship with Indian country. Now the justices are considering an even bigger step.