Trump thought about it. Biden should do it.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

The court’s bump-stock ruling is a shell game.

It’s fairer to say that the president took steps to shrink it, rather than abolish it entirely. But even that put John Cornyn’s knickers in a twist.

At oral arguments on Monday, the court took a dim view of the heavy-handed way that Andrew Cuomo and the State of New York attempted to crack down on the gun rights group.

Two years after the high court’s ruling in Bruen, we now live in a world with a constitutional expectation that any firearm is a legal firearm.

October’s mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine, was one of more than a dozen high-profile attacks carried out by people who retained their gun rights after hospitalization during a mental health crisis.

Originalism is all the rage on the right, but a gun case at the Supreme Court is exposing its absurdity—even to the conservative justices.

The justices heard a case challenging a federal law restricting guns for domestic abusers—and saw an opportunity to clean up the mess their previous gun ruling has caused.

A lower court split over bump stocks—a device that enabled the deadliest mass shooting in American history—is sending fresh cases steaming toward the high court.

Justices Roberts and Barrett joined the liberals to uphold federal regulations on so-called “ghost guns.”

The court could issue a ruling on gun ownership that would have a catastrophic impact on victims of domestic violence.

The court’s right-wing bloc has lately applied a “history-and-tradition” test to Second Amendment cases—and it might help the younger Biden avoid jail time.

A federal appeals court ruling could have a massive impact on the future of gun safety in America.

The conservative justice has a lot to add on the biggest cases.

A sociologist spoke with 50 gun sellers about 2020’s dramatic uptick in firearms sales and its effects.

9/11 was supposed to usher in an era of catastrophic jihadist attacks. Instead, we’re living in fear of a different kind of mass violence.

A recent lower court ruling has neatly exposed the Supreme Court’s conservative majority’s funny ideas about the Bill of Rights.

A recent Supreme Court ruling on gun rights is leading to interesting results in the lower courts.

Take 330 million people, 400 million guns, and a media that induces paranoia and glorifies gun violence, and, well, what do you expect?