Donald Trump apparently can’t handle the fact that the justices thought his arguments were bad.

The Trump administration’s brief against the Fourteenth Amendment is a bad one, and it naturally led to some tortured legal reasoning from his solicitor general.

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan was unconvinced by the government’s arguments on birthright citizenship.

Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas weren’t alone in opposing an ethics code.

William Rehnquist went from a lonely dissenter to an institutionalist chief—and his opinions are all the rage among the court’s current conservatives.

The Supreme Court justice ripped her conservative colleagues’ “flawed” decision to kneecap the federal government.

Killing off Chevron deference, the court moves power to the judicial branch, portending chaos.

Justice Kagan issued a scathing dissent of her conservative colleagues, who she claims are desperate for power.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor called out her conservative colleagues for ignoring a “mountain of precedent.”

Idaho hospitals may perform emergency abortions—for now.

The court mistakenly released an opinion allowing hospitals in Idaho to perform emergency abortions.

The Supreme Court justice took aim at her conservative colleagues’ supposed originalist beliefs.

The high court’s decision to leave a controversial lower court decision intact does not necessarily spell doom for First Amendment rights.

The justices unanimously ignored the plain text of the Fourteenth Amendment to keep Trump on the Colorado ballot—but some of them ignored their oaths as well.

The justices spent Thursday’s oral arguments looking for an off-ramp from kicking the former president out of the presidential race.

At oral arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts emerged as the likely deciding vote in a case that will determine whether unelected judges take control of the administrative state.

But the conservative majority seemed less inclined to upend the administrative state.

The justices heard a case challenging a federal law restricting guns for domestic abusers—and saw an opportunity to clean up the mess their previous gun ruling has caused.

Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are defiant, the rest are varying levels of quiet.

Instead of greeting the most recent set of decisions from the Roberts Court with downcast disses, critics should recognize—and celebrate—the way they influenced the results.