Israel keeps encroaching on Palestinian land in defiance of international law.

It seems disinformation about recent pro-Palestine protests has made it all the way to the White House.

A provisional order for Israel to withdraw from Rafah would provide a clear legal standard the United States would be obliged to follow.

​The Jewish studies professor S​haul Magid thinks it’s possible to resist Zionism without rejecting the state. He calls this “counter-Zionism.”

It’s the International Law Department, which gives the army permission to kill 15 to 20 civilians per combatant death and pastes a veneer of properness over IDF operations.

During war, cultural property is supposed to be immune from attack. ​In Gaza, it’s being rapidly destroyed.

Critics of the administration still feel it is falling short—but they believe the pressure they’re bringing is starting to be felt.

American Jews’ long-standing consensus about Israel has fractured. There may be no going back.

American society doesn’t know how to respond to tragedies like this one.

The president will crush Dean Phillips. But if “uncommitted” beats expectations dramatically, this may be the most complicated blowout in presidential primary history.

The president’s foolish trust in Netanyahu was a terrible mistake. It’s not too late to correct—barely—but tough medicine is required.

The settlers and their allies take for granted that fewer Palestinians—not counting those already slain—will live in their homeland once the conflict is over.

In the wake of Hamas’s October 7th attacks, efforts to silence pro-Palestinian speech are ramping up.

The judges’ provisional ruling dismissed almost every objection—moral, technical, procedural—thrown up by the Israeli defense team.

Lawyers for Israel defended the country’s bombardment of Gaza with a polite, legal form of blackmail.

How can those claiming to “stand with Israel” stand by and even actively support Netanyahu’s atrocious government?

South Africa’s claim that Israel is committing genocide may take years to adjudicate. But another Hague court—that’s also looking at Hamas—can move much faster.

Harvard was right to shield its president from irate donors—but wrong to insinuate that the donors eventually won.

Experts aren't mincing words about the Israeli leader's brutal and disproportionate response to the October 7 Hamas attacks.

The rise of “Messianic Judaism” has reached the point where IDF soldiers are being proselytized to on the front lines.