The conservative justice once warned that the broadest application of individual religious freedom would lead to “anarchy.” But the conservative bloc seems keen to court it.

The president is already musing about how he’ll protect his criminal enablers from the reach of the courts. But the legislative branch has the power to see that some justice is served.

The administration’s attempts to grab power through its novel reading of the supremacy clause have, thus far, been consistently thwarted. But it’s another steady attack on constitutional norms.

Robert Bork’s 1987 confirmation hearings suddenly have new relevance in a case that could upend the status quo in internet tracking.

In the midst of his will-he-or-won’t-he retirement tour, the justice is at great pains to make his view of originalism make a lick of sense.

The city of Boulder, Colorado, is seeking redress from the harms it says Big Oil caused to its community. After oral arguments, it’s an open question how the Roberts court will rule.

From gun safety to voting rights, executive power to immigration reform, the Roberts court has returned to cast a long shadow over American life.

There is a straight line between the high court’s grisly machinations and the horrors that befell Christa Pike in the execution chamber.

The president has decided that there is one neat trick for earning judicial compliance for a range of vanity projects and constitutional abuses.

Among the many ideas to change a wayward court, there is one that already has broad support—and is very likely to succeed.

Court-watchers will get an early look at just how audacious the conservative bloc is going to be this fall.

The Protect College Sports Act will only protect the NCAA’s billions. It deserves to go down in flames.

The high court declines to let Trump blow up the midterms, but this should have been a unanimous decision.

The Supreme Court will consider whether to overturn state bans on assault weapons—alongside some rather disturbing arguments.

No, the high court hasn’t had a change of heart where gerrymandering is concerned. But it does seem to have little stomach for electoral chicanery.

The high court’s recent decision on the illegal addition to the White House shines a light on just how willing it is to let Donald Trump break the law.

With South Carolina Democrat Jim Clyburn now in favor of expanding the high court, Democrats seem to have accepted that changing the status quo is necessary.

The high court’s shadow-docket decision isn’t the final word on mail-in ballots, but it reveals the conservative bloc’s comfort with the administration’s voter suppression schemes.

The LAPD wrecked a business owner’s shop while chasing a fugitive, and the city is refusing to compensate him. The next stop could be the Roberts court.