There is a way out of the looming partisan arms race that threatens to unravel the nation.

Their leaders’ timidity has failed to limit Republican extremism. So it will cost them nothing to fight tooth and nail against McConnell’s latest plot.

The Democrats prefer to whine about Republican extremism rather than retaliate. If the party wins in November, nothing less than absolute ruthlessness will do.

Its obviousness shows Republicans no longer even try to persuade.

The meme-ification of the justice was just one part of the brand-driven, girl-bossed, leaned-in conception of women’s freedom in which it incubated.

They should be able to delay until after the election—and if they take back the Senate in November, McConnell may not be able to get anyone confirmed.

The late justice’s legacy is a towering monument to liberalism’s quest for equal rights.

There’s no sugarcoating it: Republicans are going to make the court even more conservative. But Americans can limit the damage in November.

The Supreme Court justice was both an icon and a symbol of modern liberalism’s flawed approach to accruing power.

The public airing of Supreme Court arguments has laid bare just how ill-equipped the justices are to handle the basic tenets of Indian law.

He has pledged to pick a woman for vice president and a black woman for the Supreme Court. That’s not as unusual as it sounds.

His attempt to include a citizenship question on the census is part of a broader legal crusade that predates his presidency—and will outlive it.

The Supreme Court justice had no patience for a legal challenge to a huge Christian cross maintained with taxpayer dollars.

Another four years of Trump will widen the conservative tilt of the Supreme Court. So why aren't the Democratic candidates talking about it?

Does it help or harm justice when state and federal governments can separately prosecute a defendant for the same crime?

The text of the Constitution says no such thing.

The justices signed off on Trump's travel ban at the cost of their own credibility—and perhaps emboldening him further.

A new ruling establishes a huge hurdle for employees trying to sue their employers.

If Republicans refuse to let the other party govern, all options should be on the table.

Why are the justices hearing fewer cases and taking longer to decide them?