Conservatives are locking in an outrageous partisan gerrymander—and locking out nearly half of the state’s voters.

Now that the Supreme Court has upended the labor landscape of amateur sports, the college athletics cartel looks to lawmakers for help.

Justices Roberts and Barrett joined the liberals to uphold federal regulations on so-called “ghost guns.”

What few constitutional rights the homeless enjoy may soon be on the line at the high court.

The Supreme Court heard arguments on a redistricting case that will determine how steep a hill Democrat Michael B. Moore will have to climb to unseat the Republican.

He and his legal team claim the Constitution absolves him of any responsibility for January 6. It does not.

New York City landlords have petitioned the high court to repeal the laws that have benefited the city’s tenants for generations.

The court could issue a ruling on gun ownership that would have a catastrophic impact on victims of domestic violence.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s defenders may have won over some of the Supreme Court’s conservative justices.

The Sacklers’ settlement includes a release that can shield them and others like them from legal consequences. The ramifications are huge.

Two cases this term might cement a new order of judicial supremacy—and end the idea of a government by “We the People.”

He’s a conservative, sure. But he’s from another era. This new term may finally open his eyes.

The Supreme Court could open the door for drawing racially discriminatory districts in the name of partisan gerrymandering.

Liberal pressure contributed to an unexpected tempering of the conservative justices’ extremes last time out. We’ll know soon if that will endure.

The high court had little to say in the face of the state’s defiance, but that silence spoke volumes.

The Supreme Court is surprisingly holding the line on voting rights.

Puritanical Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk doesn’t like the way everyone interprets the First Amendment.

Advocates and politicians have recently turned away from the “pro-choice” and “pro-life” labels.

Even the Supreme Court’s lax bribery standards might not let him off.

A new ProPublica report reveals deep, unethical connections between the Supreme Court justice and the Koch brothers.