The Supreme Court will have a chance to decide whether lawmakers went too far in regulating the industry.

The administration's escalation of an open-ended conflict with the Houthis has reawakened the long-running debate over who has the power to go to war.

The recent Texas razor-wire case highlights the way the justices can use the so-called “shadow docket” to resolve disputes while obfuscating their rationale.

At oral arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts emerged as the likely deciding vote in a case that will determine whether unelected judges take control of the administrative state.

The former president made little headway while in office against the administrative state, but the Roberts court is ready to step in.

Philip Anschutz has funded some of the parties involved in the case the justice will hear on Wednesday. He also has extensive ties to the justice himself.

If the courts decide that insurrection merits immunity, and Trump wins back the presidency, what might he feel emboldened to do in term two?

A lot of what the mogul does is both evil and nuts. This campaign, sad to say, is just evil.

The Satanic Temple is helping students form after-school clubs, and parents are furious—but they’re blaming the wrong people.

Governor Greg Abbott signed a bill this week declaring that the state will enforce federal immigration laws within its own borders. Even the Supreme Court may find that to be a bridge too far.

Critics of the court’s ruling are breezily dismissing the notion there should be any legal accountability for Trump’s actions on January 6.

The former president took his Avignon presidency to the courtroom in 2023. Will he win back the White House from the hot seat in 2024?

The Roberts court is getting back to what it does best: providing a safe haven for political scoundrels.

If you want to know what the post-Dobbs future looks like, look at what the state of Texas did to Kate Cox.

Favorable terrain—and friendlier courts—have been found far from Washington, D.C.

In a sign that its recent regard for restraint is prevailing, the Roberts court is signaling that it’ll take a narrow approach on mifepristone.

If history and precedent is any guide, the former president should not expect respite from the justices.

Attorney General Ken Paxton personally intervened to endanger Kate Cox’s life and preserve the Lone Star State’s post-Roe dystopia.

GOP lawmakers in vulnerable districts believe that the White House’s refusal to respond to subpoenas has given them leeway to push the envelope.

At Tuesday’s oral arguments, the justices seemed bent on a narrow ruling that would preserve the tax code—and not preemptively rule a wealth tax unconstitutional.