Two cases this term might cement a new order of judicial supremacy—and end the idea of a government by “We the People.”

Liberal pressure contributed to an unexpected tempering of the conservative justices’ extremes last time out. We’ll know soon if that will endure.

The justices have agreed to hear a case that could make it easier to kneecap federal agencies.

The high court cast aside the people’s elected representatives to enact the climate-denial agenda of the megadonors who funded its nominations. It won’t stop there.

The court’s conservatives seem eager to take apart the mechanics of liberal governance, but they’re having commitment issues.

Progressive Democrats are right to call for more aggressive use of regulatory powers. But like the Democrats’ congressional majorities, these may not last forever.

Neil Gorsuch’s recent invocation of the “major questions doctrine” has ominous implications for anyone not keen on watching the government drown in dysfunction.

This week, the high court will take up the matter of Chevron deference—the judicial doctrine that currently allows the executive branch to function.