The conservative majority wants to apply a “history and tradition” test to the Second Amendment. But whose history—and what traditions—have yet to be decided.

Can the Aloha State defy the Roberts court on a controversial Second Amendment decision? They may soon find out.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

Thomas whined that his Supreme Court colleagues had misinterpreted one of his previous opinions in their latest ruling.

State Republican lawmakers cut off debate to force the bill through.

Wait until you hear this state senator’s argument for killing the legislation.

At oral arguments on Monday, the court took a dim view of the heavy-handed way that Andrew Cuomo and the State of New York attempted to crack down on the gun rights group.

A lower court split over bump stocks—a device that enabled the deadliest mass shooting in American history—is sending fresh cases steaming toward the high court.

The court’s right-wing bloc has lately applied a “history-and-tradition” test to Second Amendment cases—and it might help the younger Biden avoid jail time.

Leaving 43 million people in debt and legalizing anti-gay discrimination apparently wasn’t nearly enough.

The United States of America will be a vastly different country by the end of the month.

Two liberal interest groups—the ACLU and a coalition of public defenders—have waded into the high court’s upcoming concealed-carry decision, but on opposite sides.

After a decade of silence on the Second Amendment, the justices are taking up a New York concealed-carry case. The ruling could bring seismic changes to America.

The Trump presidency has been a literal call to arms for excitable whites who view nonwhite people as inherent threats.