By blessing the president’s rampant abuse of the rule of law, the high court has guaranteed that we’ll be seeing more of it.

The justice wrote a scathing dissenting opinion in the court’s latest decision to back Donald Trump.

Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas weren’t alone in opposing an ethics code.

The diversity of his high-ranking hires in government and the courts has shattered records—even Obama’s.

The liberal justice, dissenting from the majority’s ruling on Trump’s immunity case, quoted the court’s Dobbs decision back to them.

The Supreme Court justice ripped her conservative colleagues’ “flawed” decision to kneecap the federal government.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor called out her conservative colleagues for ignoring a “mountain of precedent.”

The court mistakenly released an opinion allowing hospitals in Idaho to perform emergency abortions.

The Supreme Court justice took aim at her conservative colleagues’ supposed originalist beliefs.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

Fox News is desperate to talk about anything but the millions of dollars in gifts Clarence Thomas has received as a Supreme Court justice.

The justices unanimously ignored the plain text of the Fourteenth Amendment to keep Trump on the Colorado ballot—but some of them ignored their oaths as well.

The justices spent Thursday’s oral arguments looking for an off-ramp from kicking the former president out of the presidential race.

But the conservative majority seemed less inclined to upend the administrative state.

The affirmative action ruling doesn’t end the diversity debate so much as push it into new areas.

Some of the justices appear uneasy with Section 230, which many tech firms use as their main shield against lawsuits. But they also seemed unsure about how to change it.

In an exclusive interview, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer says our work is just beginning.

The White House’s commitment to filling vacancies on the bench got a big boost when Democrats lucked into an expanded Senate majority.

The president has made the most of Democratic control of the Senate.

The hot new electoral subversion idea brewed up by the conservative legal movement may be too extreme for some of the Supreme Court’s conservatives.