The Supreme Court’s decision could empower multiple states to slash funding to the crucial health services provider.

A fiery dissent from the newest justice warns that the Supreme Court is doing grievous reputational harm to itself by playing favorites with “moneyed interests.”

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a scathing disssent, called out the rest of the court for allowing Trump’s harmful executive order to stand.

The Trump administration’s brief against the Fourteenth Amendment is a bad one, and it naturally led to some tortured legal reasoning from his solicitor general.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized the president’s unsettling attacks on the judiciary.

By blessing the president’s rampant abuse of the rule of law, the high court has guaranteed that we’ll be seeing more of it.

The justice wrote a scathing dissenting opinion in the court’s latest decision to back Donald Trump.

The diversity of his high-ranking hires in government and the courts has shattered records—even Obama’s.

The liberal justice, dissenting from the majority’s ruling on Trump’s immunity case, quoted the court’s Dobbs decision back to them.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

The justices unanimously ignored the plain text of the Fourteenth Amendment to keep Trump on the Colorado ballot—but some of them ignored their oaths as well.

The justices spent Thursday’s oral arguments looking for an off-ramp from kicking the former president out of the presidential race.

But the conservative majority seemed less inclined to upend the administrative state.

The affirmative action ruling doesn’t end the diversity debate so much as push it into new areas.

Some of the justices appear uneasy with Section 230, which many tech firms use as their main shield against lawsuits. But they also seemed unsure about how to change it.

In an exclusive interview, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer says our work is just beginning.

The White House’s commitment to filling vacancies on the bench got a big boost when Democrats lucked into an expanded Senate majority.

The hot new electoral subversion idea brewed up by the conservative legal movement may be too extreme for some of the Supreme Court’s conservatives.

The high court’s conservatives could alter protections for LGBTQ citizens based on a case whose plaintiff describes an entirely hypothetical injury.

Who gets the final say on deportations and enforcement, Washington or the states? The high court faces some nettlesome questions—and some intriguing divisions.