The ruling was ultimately a victory for the Fourteenth Amendment and a loss for the conservative legal movement that’s been trying to erase it.

John Roberts called out inconsistencies in Samuel Alito’s argument.

The conservative bloc’s only consistent practice is its inconsistent application of its own “history-and-tradition” test.

Samuel Alito led the majority on a despicable, precedent-shredding misadventure so that they could whitewash the president’s calumnies and expel the refugees he hates.

A shadow docket reveals that for some justices, there are limits to how cruel an execution can be. And for others, there are none.

In a controversial shadow-docket ruling, the high court’s conservative bloc has fully dismantled the constitutional protections of Black voters.

Philip Alito has been working in the Trump administration as his father refused to recuse himself in related cases before the Supreme Court.

It was a limited victory, but it broke with the high court’s long-standing favor toward the death penalty.

A recent shadow docket decision suggests that the court isn’t hungry for further legal restrictions on abortion. But there are two familiar holdouts.

The justice has significant—and familiar—conflicts of interest in an upcoming Big Oil case. The question is: Will he recuse himself?

Alito cited data provided by the Department of Justice that used faulty methodology.

The Supreme Court’s recent gerrymandering ruling has touched off an instantaneous demolition of Black political power as state lawmakers roll back the Second Reconstruction.

After the Supreme Court struck down school integration, guess what happened in the schools? The same thing that’s about to happen with congressional districts.

The conservative bloc has dismantled the law that ensures that Black Americans can fully participate in American electoral politics.

The president doesn’t seem to remember what happened to Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The president won’t increase the conservative bloc’s margins, but he could more deeply entrench the high court’s Trumpist bent.

The recent oral arguments in an important voting rights case suggest that the right wing of the high court has a suspect media diet.

For the court’s conservatives, the only consistency is their inconsistency. Still, things rather conspicuously keep going the GOP’s way.

The associate justice’s dissent in the tariffs case deserves some extra attention, because it is hopelessly uncoupled from law, history, and the Constitution.

Samuel Alito has a book coming out in early October. A little weird that he’s doing a book tour right after the court’s new session kicks off?