Amy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.

Defendants seeking relief from capital punishment typically don’t win at the high court, but Richard Glossip’s case was a bridge too far—for most of the justices, anyway.

The Supreme Court justice went down a bizarre line of questioning in the middle of the hearing.

Politico’s Kyle Cheney discusses Representative Raskin’s sharp criticism of Trump’s private phone call with Justice Alito, when we’ll see the Jack Smith reports, and the Supreme Court’s legitimacy issues.

Trump’s chat with Justice Alito draws scrutiny, even as Trump asks the courts for help on multiple fronts. A leading reporter explains why the tangled nexus of all these stories is raising legitimacy issues.

We can all agree that Supreme Court justices shouldn’t face threats of physical violence. But only in the chief justice’s warped, cloistered world does criticism of the high court constitute intimidation.

A massive lobbying push and a critical Supreme Court decision put the ability to wager our life savings in the palms of our hands. The gamble hasn’t paid off.

The high court appeared ready to deal a savage blow to the rights and livelihoods of a group that conservatives have spent the year targeting.

The high court will hear a trio of cases that might permit environmental scofflaws greater leave to go forum shopping for friendly lower court judges.

William Rehnquist went from a lonely dissenter to an institutionalist chief—and his opinions are all the rage among the court’s current conservatives.

The overturning of Roe was always going to affect more than just abortion, and we’re about to find out how bad it can get.

A new case the high court may take up this term concerns when judges should recuse themselves. It’s a problem with which these justices are intimately familiar.

Everyone’s wondering what the Democratic nominee plans to do in office. Not much, without the permission of Chief Justice John Roberts and his cronies.

Ocasio-Cortez’s articles of impeachment against the rogue justices probably won’t remove them. But history suggests it might help tame the court in other ways.

Trump’s election permitted conservatives to cement their hold on the court. This year could be as important.

Idaho hospitals may perform emergency abortions—for now.

The Supreme Court justice took aim at her conservative colleagues’ supposed originalist beliefs.

As the Supreme Court’s ethical crises mount, a veteran political strategist explains how the court’s MAGA justices are already giving Trump a big electoral assist—and why it’s about to get uglier.

People can and should debate Windsor’s methods. What’s beyond debate is that she reveals important truths we’re better off knowing.

The court’s bump-stock ruling is a shell game.