The conservative justices have ignored history altogether and created a shocking new precedent: The president is above the law.

The liberal justice, dissenting from the majority’s ruling on Trump’s immunity case, quoted the court’s Dobbs decision back to them.

Monday’s immunity ruling made the stakes of this election even higher—and made it clear that Biden must step aside for someone who can stop Trump and save the country.

Killing off Chevron deference, the court moves power to the judicial branch, portending chaos.

Thursday’s ruling in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy avoided the worst-case scenarios.

The Framers designed the judiciary as the weakest branch. John Marshall changed all that. And today, we’re paying the price for it.

Idaho hospitals may perform emergency abortions—for now.

The justices have picked a case that can cause maximum harm with minimum blowback.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

But will the high court follow long-standing precedent or its more recent trends?

She’s still conservative, but she seems to want to prevent her Supreme Court colleagues from going too far too quickly.

People can and should debate Windsor’s methods. What’s beyond debate is that she reveals important truths we’re better off knowing.

Conservative justices on the court have a chance to hand two big wins to fossil fuel companies. Their links to those companies should worry us.

The court’s bump-stock ruling is a shell game.

The Supreme Court shot down a lousy argument from a fabricated plaintiff. But anti-abortion groups still have other paths to ban medication abortion.

Thanks, Justice Kavanaugh!

Hint: It comes from what Roberts said, not Alito.

A baby products company and an anti-woke activist group are trying to weaken a critical consumer watchdog agency. If one of their cases reaches the Supreme Court, we’re all in trouble.

The state GOP just approved a party platform that would effectively ensure one-party rule.

As Grants Pass, Oregon—and the nation—await a Supreme Court ruling on just how far cities can police the homeless, a volunteer mayor and her unhoused constituents try to weather the backlash.