The conservative majority wants to apply a “history and tradition” test to the Second Amendment. But whose history—and what traditions—have yet to be decided.

The Supreme Court’s second-newest justice is proving herself to be a non-hack—to the increasing consternation of MAGA.

Defendants seeking relief from capital punishment typically don’t win at the high court, but Richard Glossip’s case was a bridge too far—for most of the justices, anyway.

We can all agree that Supreme Court justices shouldn’t face threats of physical violence. But only in the chief justice’s warped, cloistered world does criticism of the high court constitute intimidation.

Can the Aloha State defy the Roberts court on a controversial Second Amendment decision? They may soon find out.

William Rehnquist went from a lonely dissenter to an institutionalist chief—and his opinions are all the rage among the court’s current conservatives.

The overturning of Roe was always going to affect more than just abortion, and we’re about to find out how bad it can get.

A new case the high court may take up this term concerns when judges should recuse themselves. It’s a problem with which these justices are intimately familiar.

Everyone’s wondering what the Democratic nominee plans to do in office. Not much, without the permission of Chief Justice John Roberts and his cronies.

If Democrats survive the coming onslaught from billionaire donors, their first order of business next year must be to strip this cancer out of our body politic.

Ocasio-Cortez’s articles of impeachment against the rogue justices probably won’t remove them. But history suggests it might help tame the court in other ways.

Trump’s election permitted conservatives to cement their hold on the court. This year could be as important.

Clarence Thomas says Jack Smith should go back to The Hague and prosecute European war criminals, because American fascists are now officially immune.

The liberal justice, dissenting from the majority’s ruling on Trump’s immunity case, quoted the court’s Dobbs decision back to them.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

As the Supreme Court’s ethical crises mount, a veteran political strategist explains how the court’s MAGA justices are already giving Trump a big electoral assist—and why it’s about to get uglier.

She’s still conservative, but she seems to want to prevent her Supreme Court colleagues from going too far too quickly.

The court’s bump-stock ruling is a shell game.

In a Supreme Court decision siding with South Carolina Republicans, the right-wing justice took the opportunity to attack landmark civil rights rulings that protected Black voters’ political representation.

The Supreme Court justices are intent on using maximal power to fundamentally reorder society.