The high court ruled that gun restrictions must pass a “history and tradition” test to be valid. Then the state of Hawaii called its bluff.

During oral arguments on Tuesday, the conservative justices only seemed to diverge over how far their ruling should go.

Trump, Noem, Miller, Vance—yes, they are the chief authors of this tyranny. But Washington is full of enablers. Be mad at them too.

The president has used the right-wing bloc’s extreme solicitousness to facilitate new heights of corruption. But there may be lines that the high court won’t cross.

The Roberts court’s reality distortions have thoroughly disrupted the law, facts, and democracy.

Alexander Hamilton’s treatise on executive power is one of the conservative legal movement’s favorite texts to quote—and misquote.

Republicans are looking to the justices to remove a key campaign finance restriction. Most of the court’s right-wing majority doesn’t seem to want to play along.

The Roberts court is about to hand the president—and an untold number of financial predators—a massive win.

At oral arguments in the tariffs case, the conservative justices seemed ready to hit the president with the legal rationale they used to bedevil Joe Biden.

Or, as Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani would say: Tax the rich.

In another one of their “history and tradition” tests, the justices stand poised to upend laws all across the country.

The Roberts court has long had a monomaniacal obsession with gutting the laws that guarantee the right to vote. They are on the brink of getting their wish.

At oral arguments, the high court’s conservatives seemed inclined to back gay conversion therapy. But they ultimately may not stop there.

Stopping and reversing the degradation of the Trump era will require a more radical strategy—and a bigger target.

The Roberts court has unerringly sided against anyone seeking to curb political corruption, and it would be a shock if it decided to switch sides now.

If things stay true to form, President Trump will benefit from the Roberts court’s generous takes on executive power. The rest of us may not be so lucky.

The court’s conservatives spent last term bailing out the administration with shadow docket shams. Now they must reckon with all the cans they kicked down the road.

Chief Justice John Roberts has now overseen 20 years of increasingly illiberal rulings by the Supreme Court.

While the Roberts court has issued a trove of suspect decisions over the years, the one area of the law in which it’s been consistently virtuous is the First Amendment.

Between a permissive Supreme Court and his own governing innovations, the president has greatly expanded executive power. Liberals, take note.