The recent oral arguments in an important voting rights case suggest that the right wing of the high court has a suspect media diet.

The high court’s campaign to provide cover to the quid pro quo arrangement of corrupt politicians seems set to continue.

The Supreme Court’s chief justice isn’t impressed by Trump’s diatribes.

For the court’s conservatives, the only consistency is their inconsistency. Still, things rather conspicuously keep going the GOP’s way.

It may look like the justices made a clean break with the president, but the mess the conservative bloc made for itself raises some major questions.

President Trump is pissed at the conservative justices who voted to strike down his tariffs.

The high court ruled that gun restrictions must pass a “history and tradition” test to be valid. Then the state of Hawaii called its bluff.

During oral arguments on Tuesday, the conservative justices only seemed to diverge over how far their ruling should go.

Trump, Noem, Miller, Vance—yes, they are the chief authors of this tyranny. But Washington is full of enablers. Be mad at them too.

The president has used the right-wing bloc’s extreme solicitousness to facilitate new heights of corruption. But there may be lines that the high court won’t cross.

The Roberts court’s reality distortions have thoroughly disrupted the law, facts, and democracy.

Alexander Hamilton’s treatise on executive power is one of the conservative legal movement’s favorite texts to quote—and misquote.

Republicans are looking to the justices to remove a key campaign finance restriction. Most of the court’s right-wing majority doesn’t seem to want to play along.

The Roberts court is about to hand the president—and an untold number of financial predators—a massive win.

At oral arguments in the tariffs case, the conservative justices seemed ready to hit the president with the legal rationale they used to bedevil Joe Biden.

Or, as Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani would say: Tax the rich.

In another one of their “history and tradition” tests, the justices stand poised to upend laws all across the country.

The Roberts court has long had a monomaniacal obsession with gutting the laws that guarantee the right to vote. They are on the brink of getting their wish.

At oral arguments, the high court’s conservatives seemed inclined to back gay conversion therapy. But they ultimately may not stop there.

Stopping and reversing the degradation of the Trump era will require a more radical strategy—and a bigger target.