Alexander Hamilton’s treatise on executive power is one of the conservative legal movement’s favorite texts to quote—and misquote.

Republicans are looking to the justices to remove a key campaign finance restriction. Most of the court’s right-wing majority doesn’t seem to want to play along.

The Roberts court is about to hand the president—and an untold number of financial predators—a massive win.

At oral arguments in the tariffs case, the conservative justices seemed ready to hit the president with the legal rationale they used to bedevil Joe Biden.

Or, as Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani would say: Tax the rich.

In another one of their “history and tradition” tests, the justices stand poised to upend laws all across the country.

The Roberts court has long had a monomaniacal obsession with gutting the laws that guarantee the right to vote. They are on the brink of getting their wish.

At oral arguments, the high court’s conservatives seemed inclined to back gay conversion therapy. But they ultimately may not stop there.

Stopping and reversing the degradation of the Trump era will require a more radical strategy—and a bigger target.

The Roberts court has unerringly sided against anyone seeking to curb political corruption, and it would be a shock if it decided to switch sides now.

If things stay true to form, President Trump will benefit from the Roberts court’s generous takes on executive power. The rest of us may not be so lucky.

The court’s conservatives spent last term bailing out the administration with shadow docket shams. Now they must reckon with all the cans they kicked down the road.

Chief Justice John Roberts has now overseen 20 years of increasingly illiberal rulings by the Supreme Court.

While the Roberts court has issued a trove of suspect decisions over the years, the one area of the law in which it’s been consistently virtuous is the First Amendment.

Between a permissive Supreme Court and his own governing innovations, the president has greatly expanded executive power. Liberals, take note.

If you’re wondering how the high court’s lawless sausage got made, we must turn to an obscure line from a long-forgotten 1977 case.

Will they follow their own precedents and rule against the president, or twist themselves in knots to give him yet another win?

The most recent petition demanding a repeal of the landmark gay marriage law has lit headlines afire, but there are signs that the Supreme Court is not yet ready to do the deed.

For the court’s conservative bloc, the line between upholding the Constitution and serving as Donald Trump’s personal attorneys has all but disappeared.

The Roberts court majority seems bound and determined to undermine the American constitutional order.