The Supreme Court carved out an exception for the military academies to continue considering race as a factor in admissions. Right-wing activists aim to shut it down.

The recent Texas razor-wire case highlights the way the justices can use the so-called “shadow docket” to resolve disputes while obfuscating their rationale.

At oral arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts emerged as the likely deciding vote in a case that will determine whether unelected judges take control of the administrative state.

At Tuesday’s oral arguments, the justices seemed bent on a narrow ruling that would preserve the tax code—and not preemptively rule a wealth tax unconstitutional.

But the conservative majority seemed less inclined to upend the administrative state.

The high court’s new guidelines have come in for a lot of criticism, but they’re the perfect platform for reformers to keep applying pressure.

Trump-appointed judges are to blame.

Justices Roberts and Barrett joined the liberals to uphold federal regulations on so-called “ghost guns.”

Liberal pressure contributed to an unexpected tempering of the conservative justices’ extremes last time out. We’ll know soon if that will endure.

He’s a conservative, sure. But he’s from another era. This new term may finally open his eyes.

The high court had little to say in the face of the state’s defiance, but that silence spoke volumes.

Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are defiant, the rest are varying levels of quiet.

Joe Kennedy’s phony tale of religious discrimination may have reached a predictable end this week, but it illuminated an important truth about the Supreme Court.

The Roberts court made a rare ruling in favor of voting rights back in July, but a later decision may have given state lawmakers a winning hand to play.

Republicans haven’t lost too often at the high court of late—but when they do, they’re sore losers indeed.

Instead of greeting the most recent set of decisions from the Roberts Court with downcast disses, critics should recognize—and celebrate—the way they influenced the results.

The former president is demanding a change in trial venue, for the same reason he demanded that votes not get counted in certain U.S. cities.

At least one Supreme Court justice thinks something needs to change.

The Federalist Society’s leader is hoping to pluck a “get out of jail free” card from Donald Trump’s back pocket.

The chief justice doesn’t like his conservative Supreme Court colleagues getting called out for judicial overreach.