William Rehnquist went from a lonely dissenter to an institutionalist chief—and his opinions are all the rage among the court’s current conservatives.

In his new book he rails against the regulatory state and explains why judges should have its power instead.

Trump’s election permitted conservatives to cement their hold on the court. This year could be as important.

The Supreme Court justice ripped her conservative colleagues’ “flawed” decision to kneecap the federal government.

The Supreme Court has sent the question of Donald Trump’s immunity back to a lower court, essentially scuppering any chance of a preelection trial.

Conservative justices this week confused nitrous oxide with nitrogen oxides and then insisted that they, not the EPA, were the final word on environmental regulations.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor called out her conservative colleagues for ignoring a “mountain of precedent.”

The court mistakenly released an opinion allowing hospitals in Idaho to perform emergency abortions.

The Supreme Court justice took aim at her conservative colleagues’ supposed originalist beliefs.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case on whether states can ban gender-affirming care for minors.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

The justices opened the door for legislation on a wealth tax.

The Supreme Court justice noted her conservative colleagues quickly abandoned their textualist principles in the ruling on bump stocks.

The Supreme Court will have a chance to decide whether lawmakers went too far in regulating the industry.

The recent Texas razor-wire case highlights the way the justices can use the so-called “shadow docket” to resolve disputes while obfuscating their rationale.

At oral arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts emerged as the likely deciding vote in a case that will determine whether unelected judges take control of the administrative state.

The former president made little headway while in office against the administrative state, but the Roberts court is ready to step in.

Philip Anschutz has funded some of the parties involved in the case the justice will hear on Wednesday. He also has extensive ties to the justice himself.

At Tuesday’s oral arguments, the justices seemed bent on a narrow ruling that would preserve the tax code—and not preemptively rule a wealth tax unconstitutional.

An appeals panel led by a Trump appointee is giving the Supreme Court the chance to gut one of the few major provisions remaining in the law.