The high court’s decision in the matter of the Lone Star State’s controversial abortion law seems destined to spawn further chaos.

A revealing exchange between Fox News host Laura Ingraham and the Texas senator offers a window into the ways the right views the high court.

Reproductive rights in America have been brought to the brink thanks to decades of lies and complacency.

This week, the high court will take up the matter of Chevron deference—the judicial doctrine that currently allows the executive branch to function.

The high court’s unusually generous predisposition to faith-based claims takes a back seat to Samuel Alito’s determination to end the “guerrilla war on the death penalty.”

The court’s conservative majority has targeted the EPA with a tradition-smashing move that could imperil the administrative state.

The Roberts court may have no choice but to resolve a sprawling case that threatens the Indian Child Welfare Act and the legal regime that has supported Native people.

The public’s esteem of the high court is at an all-time low, and the media is not to blame.

As the Supreme Court starts its fall term, we’ll learn whether the new conservative majority respects the court’s own precedents.

Anti-abortion forces in Texas seem supremely confident that the Roberts court will be willing to administer the killing blow to reproductive rights in America.

The state is making a breathtakingly cynical demand that the high court strip Native Americans of protections they were granted only last year.

Don’t be fooled by the burst of moderation from the justices this term.

The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in NCAA v. Alston has put the end of the organization’s exploitation of college athletes in sight.

His recent ruling shreds a precedent that offered criminal defendants a chance to challenge unjust sentences—and reveals how the court’s conservative bloc has no boundaries.

Under the guise of “religious liberty,” the conservative justices are privileging certain Americans at the expense of the rest of us.

Sloppy language might imperil the president’s landmark law—and future legislative and administrative reforms, too.

The Carter-Baker report was intended to strengthen Americans’ trust in the electoral process. Today, it’s become a favorite weapon for right-wing attacks on voting rights.

On the “postliberal” future of the federal courts

Under cover of Covid-19, the high court’s conservative bloc is dreaming up some radical ideas about religious freedom and public health.

Voters could have given Joe Biden the option to hold the high court in check. Instead, they’ve unleashed its conservative supermajority.