“Organic” Doesn’t Mean “Humane,” and Trump Likes It That Way
Obama issued a rule to help confused consumers. His successor killed it.
Obama issued a rule to help confused consumers. His successor killed it.
Coal ash ponds are contaminating groundwater across the country, but the consequences are unclear because the government doesn't monitor them.
“We really do want to help," one House Republican said. "This has to stop.”
EPA head Scott Pruitt has revived a tired talking point to cast doubt on global warming.
The National Science Foundation on Wednesday announced a new, long-overdue policy, but it's far from enough.
The story of California's rescued bears isn't just heartwarming. It's the beginning of a new way to think about burn treatment.
Parsing "two minutes to midnight"
The U.S. government does not consider sexual harassment a form of scientific misconduct. Should it?
He's barred scientists who receive EPA grants from advising the agency, but sees no conflict of interest in appointing fossil-fuel representatives.
He keeps picking deniers for top government positions: NASA might soon be run by a GOP congressman who blames global warming on the sun.
Prehistoric squid were far more numerous, and their reign lasted longer, than the dinosaurs. Why do we know so little about them?
How the discovery of X-rays and infrared made us doubt the senses.
Legal attacks, internet harassment, and a Trump-fueled "culture of fear" are making their work more difficult than ever.
The most obvious effect of global warming is not a doomsday scenario. Extreme heat is happening today, and wreaking havoc on vulnerable bodies.
Climate scientists say New York magazine's cover story about global warming is unnecessarily apocalyptic. But can fear help the planet?
A Q&A with Peter Meyer, a PhD economist at the University of Louisville.
The press is covering the president's attacks on climate science and policy, but when the time comes to press him in person, reporters go silent.
"It’s meant to unsettle people, and it’s doing a pretty good job."
Here's what New York Times columnist Bret Stephens should have written about instead of his controversial, misleading op-ed.
Bret Stephens might seem reasonable compared to conspiracy theorists, but his stealth denial is far more damaging.