For climate activists, the current moment is almost unbearably bleak. But the task is clear: to build a mass movement that completely overhauls our current political system.

Republicans might not actually repeal the Inflation Reduction Act’s green energy incentives. But Trump can do plenty of damage to international climate progress without that.

Kamala Harris chose to stay silent on climate change. Activists mostly let her. And now the White House and likely both houses of Congress will be controlled by climate deniers.

The administration bet that subsidies to rebuild American manufacturing would bring voters back to the Democratic Party while lowering emissions. That bet has failed.

New data suggests environmentally motivated voters might matter more than previously thought. But their priorities haven’t gotten much airtime this election season.

Everyone's got a suggestion for how to de-stress. Alternatively, you could stress. This is stressful!

The options for president are a climate denier and a Democrat who doesn’t like talking about climate change very much. State policy could still help avert disaster.

Kamala Harris should speak plainly about climate change—and then talk about the many things she could do as president to fix the home insurance crisis.

These devastating storms are already political. And those affected by them deserve to hear a plan for the future.

One thing that needs to be said about this week's debate: Answers that bad, about devastation that severe, should be a scandal.

A for-profit insurance industry is a bad first line of defense against natural disasters. There’s a better way.

Already we can draw two big lessons from Hurricane Helene’s catastrophic fallout.

Emissions from Apple, Meta, and Google are growing. Somehow, they’re still treated as plausible sponsors for climate events.

What is it with Republicans and dog killing?

At the U.N. on Tuesday, the president praised his administration’s climate policies. But he exaggerated a bit.

Voters’ preferences haven’t changed much since 2020, when Biden ran on a much more aggressively pro-climate platform. So why is Harris tacking so far to the right?

Harris’s climate answer was bad by design. And the immigration segments of the debate show why that’s a bad strategy.

By its own standards, the landmark piece of climate legislation was a smashing success. Its future, however, could be decided on Election Day.

The trumped-up contempt charges against a climate protester are only the latest example of extreme punishments for peaceful protests.