Justice Elena Kagan ripped her conservative colleagues for undermining federal agencies.

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are taking the Supreme Court’s controversial ruling as a green light.

Democrats spent part of their week identifying the real people who’d be harmed by Project 2025. They should follow these instincts from now till November.

Everyone’s wondering what the Democratic nominee plans to do in office. Not much, without the permission of Chief Justice John Roberts and his cronies.

The EPA says Tucson’s drinking water is contaminated, but the Air Force says it doesn’t have to do anything thanks to the Chevron ruling.

Striking down Chevron isn’t “calling balls and strikes.” It’s changing the strike zone, the size of the plate, and even the field.

The courts no longer have to bow to executive whims, which may give noncitizens a better chance.

The right-wing justices declared open season on regulations that don’t just protect the environment, health, and safety, but the economy too.

The high court sent nine cases back to the lower courts in light of recent rulings weakening federal agency authority.

Killing off Chevron deference, the court moves power to the judicial branch, portending chaos.

Justice Kagan issued a scathing dissent of her conservative colleagues, who she claims are desperate for power.

The Supreme Court has overturned decades of precedent on the administrative state—transferring more power to the judiciary.

Conservative justices on the court have a chance to hand two big wins to fossil fuel companies. Their links to those companies should worry us.

The administrative state is squarely in the high court’s crosshairs. But public pressure has successfully kept the justices from going over the brink before—and it might work again.

At oral arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts emerged as the likely deciding vote in a case that will determine whether unelected judges take control of the administrative state.

The U.S. position at the U.N. climate conference is simple: Fossil fuels for me and not for thee.

Two cases this term might cement a new order of judicial supremacy—and end the idea of a government by “We the People.”

Liberal pressure contributed to an unexpected tempering of the conservative justices’ extremes last time out. We’ll know soon if that will endure.

The oil lobby’s whining this earnings season follows a familiar pattern: Blame Biden.

The justices will have a chance to further disrupt the balance of power between the courts, Congress, and the White House.