GOP lawmakers in Washington want someone else to make the tough choice of slashing nutrition benefits—and to take the blame for who gets left behind.

Bracing for the first Trump administration, I joined a food co-op. Heading into a second, I’m more convinced than ever that resilience is cultivated through communities, not individuals.

Divisions over relief for food insecurity remain a big sticking point as lawmakers try to move this must-pass measure over the goal line.

It doesn’t involve more border patrol. Instead, policymakers need to address climate change and decades of bad U.S. foreign policy.

From a draconian new proposal in Iowa to farm bill deliberations in Washington, the ideological battles over food aid will soon kick off—and no one knows who will end up paying the price.

For the first time in 50 years, the White House held a conference to address the nationwide crises of hunger and food insecurity.

As public health emergencies end, so do emergency allotments for households receiving vital nutrition benefits.

New data from the Department of Agriculture suggests that families are increasingly losing access to nutritious meals.

The junior senator from New Jersey continues to believe in the power of interpersonal relationships in effecting policy.

Leaving essentials like food and shelter to the whims of the market produces an extreme kind of disorganization.

Democratic leaders are treating billionaires delicately in the hopes that they’ll relinquish their riches on their own. Bernie Sanders has a better idea.

The mass expansion of public goods is long past due, so pay people to stay home, give them free health care, and stop charging tuition.

As families face food insecurity and homelessness, lobbyists, massive corporations, and the American war machine are living large.

More than half a million SNAP recipients are on the edge of losing access to the crucial food safety net—just as they need it most.