The high court’s recent run at rewriting the Constitution has come for the establishment clause.

The Native plaintiffs have won over a wide variety of allies to their case. But for some reason, the high court is dragging its feet in making a decision.

Part church-versus-state conflict, part jurisdictional turf war, this Sooner State charter school fracas is one of the knottiest cases the high court has had to resolve in some time.

A bishop asked the president to show mercy to immigrants and scared children. The response tells us everything about the next four years.

The Lone Star State has passed a Christian nationalist rule.

Another Christian nationalist mandate has hit public schools, this time in Oklahoma.

But will the high court follow long-standing precedent or its more recent trends?

The right has successfully wielded the idea of sincere religious beliefs as an antisocial legal cudgel. Should the left be using it to further its own ends?

Joe Kennedy rode his “praying football coach” win at the Supreme Court to right-wing fame. He may be the first of many more to come.

Joe Kennedy’s phony tale of religious discrimination may have reached a predictable end this week, but it illuminated an important truth about the Supreme Court.

It’s not every day the Roberts court hands out labor rights, but a plaintiff may have found the one neat trick for winning it over: religious freedom claims.

The high court’s conservatives could alter protections for LGBTQ citizens based on a case whose plaintiff describes an entirely hypothetical injury.

He won’t rest until the Supreme Court enshrines religious freedom protections for a select minority of Americans—at the expense of everyone else.

The Hollywood-friendly church says its “religious arbitration” system—rather than civil courts—should apply to ex-members who say they were sexually assaulted by actor Danny Masterson. It hopes the Supreme Court agrees.

The Roberts court is showing a troubling propensity to be the willing dupe of plaintiffs with the right kind of tale to tell.

The conservative bloc’s recent religious rulings went much further than merely obliterating the firewall between church and state.

The high court’s drive to radically redefine our Constitutional rights continues apace.

Conservatives are increasingly embracing a version of religious freedom that’s designed to sow unnecessary divisions in society.

The flagpoles in front of Boston’s City Hall have become the source of a most vexing debate about religious freedom in the public square.

The high court’s unusually generous predisposition to faith-based claims takes a back seat to Samuel Alito’s determination to end the “guerrilla war on the death penalty.”