Matt Ford

No, the high court hasn’t had a change of heart where gerrymandering is concerned. But it does seem to have little stomach for electoral chicanery.

The high court’s recent decision on the illegal addition to the White House shines a light on just how willing it is to let Donald Trump break the law.

With South Carolina Democrat Jim Clyburn now in favor of expanding the high court, Democrats seem to have accepted that changing the status quo is necessary.

The president’s plan to revive a moribund court for war privateering is a lesson to Congress to clear some outdated measures off the books.

The AI industry gleefully sold its products as harmful to the interests of ordinary people. Thankfully, ordinary people decided that there would be consequences for that.

The high court’s shadow-docket decision isn’t the final word on mail-in ballots, but it reveals the conservative bloc’s comfort with the administration’s voter suppression schemes.

The LAPD wrecked a business owner’s shop while chasing a fugitive, and the city is refusing to compensate him. The next stop could be the Roberts court.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has gone to war with the state regulators trying to rein in the industry’s sports gambling interests.

The White House is serving up a staler helping of the legal arguments the Roberts court already refused to swallow.

The courts may have closed the book on this sorry chapter of our history, but the dreadful reckoning remains.

The president’s gluttony for graft is the only truly remarkable thing about his political career.

Much of what ails us can be blamed on the steady degradation of the legislature as the other branches of government grabbed power for themselves. It’s time to start undoing the damage.

The industry scored a major victory over one state’s efforts to regulate firms that critics worry will become a hotbed of insider trading.

The justice recently contended against the notion that the court has become a rubber stamp for Trump. She’s not wrong—but that’s just part of the story.

One man’s heroic actions in the face of a dangerous refinery fire left him with PTSD. A Southern federal court has opted to leave workers like him behind.

These are the ingredients that have set up a major Supreme Court case about excessive fines that could shape the future of criminal asset forfeiture across the United States.

This new trend of lawmakers going absent for an extended period of time, leaving their constituents in the dark about their health and well-being, is both untenable and intolerable.

Marco Rubio says the administration will try to “dismantle” the ICC. Who is he trying to protect?

In ruling after ruling, the Supreme Court justice has penned separate opinions to push for an expansion of executive power beyond what his conservative colleagues support.

His 10-page opinion is strangely adrift from rhyme or reason, and it ends up reinforcing a far more extreme position than any of his colleagues’.