Matt Ford

The recent oral arguments in an important voting rights case suggest that the right wing of the high court has a suspect media diet.

The high court’s campaign to provide cover to the quid pro quo arrangement of corrupt politicians seems set to continue.

The president and his allies will face impeachments, lawsuits, and maybe even The Hague.

In the final of this surprisingly thrilling and utterly joyful World Baseball Classic, Venezuela outplayed their sour opponents.

Police in Virginia located a suspect by demanding location-specific cell phone data from Google. Did that violate his constitutional rights?

In McGirt v. Oklahoma, the high court opened the door to an expansive view of tribal territory. The State of Oklahoma has been trying to shut it ever since.

Generations of lawmakers, straying from the Founders’ ideals—and fears—led inevitably to this era of unaccountable warmongering.

For the court’s conservatives, the only consistency is their inconsistency. Still, things rather conspicuously keep going the GOP’s way.

The president’s take on birthright citizenship doesn’t pass legal muster. To hear the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops tell it, it’s a moral affront as well.

The associate justice’s dissent in the tariffs case deserves some extra attention, because it is hopelessly uncoupled from law, history, and the Constitution.

While Capitol Hill lawmakers and the Supreme Court have failed to curb the administration’s authoritarianism, others are stepping into the breach to protect the Constitution.

It may look like the justices made a clean break with the president, but the mess the conservative bloc made for itself raises some major questions.

If the Supreme Court takes up Taylor v. Singleton, it could be the sum of all fears for the most vulnerable Americans.

The Minneapolis nurse’s death at the hands of federal agents has exposed the contradictions at the center of the gun rights debate.

The justices have largely let the president take a wrecking ball to the civil service, but they finally found an agency they deem too sacred for him to desecrate.

The high court ruled that gun restrictions must pass a “history and tradition” test to be valid. Then the state of Hawaii called its bluff.

The White House’s top policy aide hates a future that doesn’t center around him.

The public is coming around to the notion that the agency has to be eliminated. Fortunately, this administration and its Supreme Court allies have made that incredibly easy.

During oral arguments on Tuesday, the conservative justices only seemed to diverge over how far their ruling should go.

The Trump Doctrine is the sort of reckless misadventure that paves the road to ruin—as our own history has proven.