Donald Trump apparently can’t handle the fact that the justices thought his arguments were bad.

The Trump administration’s brief against the Fourteenth Amendment is a bad one, and it naturally led to some tortured legal reasoning from his solicitor general.

By blessing the president’s rampant abuse of the rule of law, the high court has guaranteed that we’ll be seeing more of it.

The right is pissed at the conservative Supreme Court justice for ruling against Trump’s recent deportations.

The conservative majority wants to apply a “history and tradition” test to the Second Amendment. But whose history—and what traditions—have yet to be decided.

The Supreme Court’s second-newest justice is proving herself to be a non-hack—to the increasing consternation of MAGA.

Two conservative justices joined the three liberals in ordering the administration to pay USAID contractors who are owed around $2 billion. But can that unlikely split hold?

Amy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.

Trump’s executive order stripping federal workers of legal protections is the most dangerous of his unlawful power grabs. But there is a way to win them back.

William Rehnquist went from a lonely dissenter to an institutionalist chief—and his opinions are all the rage among the court’s current conservatives.

Trump’s election permitted conservatives to cement their hold on the court. This year could be as important.

Idaho hospitals may perform emergency abortions—for now.

In Friday’s ruling on domestic violence and the Second Amendment, the other eight justices rejected his approach to originalism.

She’s still conservative, but she seems to want to prevent her Supreme Court colleagues from going too far too quickly.

The Fifth Circuit’s well-documented judicial shenanigans have earned a surprising rebuke from the high court.

The justices unanimously ignored the plain text of the Fourteenth Amendment to keep Trump on the Colorado ballot—but some of them ignored their oaths as well.

The recent Texas razor-wire case highlights the way the justices can use the so-called “shadow docket” to resolve disputes while obfuscating their rationale.

The high court’s new guidelines have come in for a lot of criticism, but they’re the perfect platform for reformers to keep applying pressure.

Justices Roberts and Barrett joined the liberals to uphold federal regulations on so-called “ghost guns.”

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s defenders may have won over some of the Supreme Court’s conservative justices.