The Supreme Court’s 6–3 tilt is inspiring right-wing judicial actors to take legal moon shots they wouldn’t have dared to attempt not long ago.

The court’s conservative majority has targeted the EPA with a tradition-smashing move that could imperil the administrative state.

The public’s esteem of the high court is at an all-time low, and the media is not to blame.

Religious exemptions from getting inoculated are coming to a federal court near you.

The two justices’ recent defenses of the Supreme Court against charges of ideological hackery are impossible to believe.

As the Supreme Court starts its fall term, we’ll learn whether the new conservative majority respects the court’s own precedents.

In the dead of night, the Supreme Court’s conservatives erased abortion rights in Texas—and signaled what they would do next.

Anti-abortion forces in Texas seem supremely confident that the Roberts court will be willing to administer the killing blow to reproductive rights in America.

The state is making a breathtakingly cynical demand that the high court strip Native Americans of protections they were granted only last year.

The plaintiffs in the next big abortion rights case quietly—and ominously—flipped their script to better suit the ideology of the new justice.

Don’t be fooled by the burst of moderation from the justices this term.

For opponents of the Affordable Care Act, this latest slapdash effort to gut the landmark law may be the last hurrah.

The Supreme Court’s most recent additions, like their conservative brethren, are no friends to abortion rights.

Under the guise of “religious liberty,” the conservative justices are privileging certain Americans at the expense of the rest of us.

The justices agreed to hear a Kentucky case that will be the first related to abortion since Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation.

Conservatives are only getting more bold in their efforts to disenfranchise Democrats.

On the “postliberal” future of the federal courts

A grim report about Dianne Feinstein’s cognitive decline underlines a larger problem with the leadership of the party.

Under cover of Covid-19, the high court’s conservative bloc is dreaming up some radical ideas about religious freedom and public health.

A jury spared Calvin McMillan’s life, but a judge sentenced him to death anyway. Will the Roberts court save or condemn him?