A Tennessee woman was forced to flee her state to seek treatment for her pregnancy.

Lawyers warned one of Elon Musk’s DOGE cronies that his investments were a conflict of interest. He fired them.

To stand up to Trump’s lawless power grabs, the Roberts court must disavow its own mirror-image corruptions. It may yet feel obliged to do just that.

Artificial intelligence is coming to warfare. Can it learn ethics?

A new case the high court may take up this term concerns when judges should recuse themselves. It’s a problem with which these justices are intimately familiar.

In a new letter, Democratic senators press the associate justice on whether he’s paid off the loan for that famous R.V.—and whether he may have ducked federal tax obligations.

It was absolutely the right thing to do in this extreme case.

The high court’s new guidelines have come in for a lot of criticism, but they’re the perfect platform for reformers to keep applying pressure.

Paul Singer, who underwrote the justice’s Alaska fishing trip, has a hedge fund that holds a large stake in a banking services company with 5,100 CFPB complaints. What will Sam do?

Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are defiant, the rest are varying levels of quiet.

The associate justice says Congress has no authority to regulate the Supreme Court. The Constitution he allegedly reveres says otherwise. A lot.

The Federalist Society’s leader is hoping to pluck a “get out of jail free” card from Donald Trump’s back pocket.

Critics of the liberal justices’ ethical lapses aren’t trying to make the case for reform—they’re trying to kill it.

It does illustrate the judicial ethics system’s blind spots, however.

Clarence Thomas’s news-making scandals have senators eager to rein in the high court. At least one Republican has signed on to the effort.

A plan to save the high court from its own excesses—with bipartisan buy-in—is gathering steam. Here are the next steps to build on the unexpected momentum.

By backing the implementation of ethics reforms already practiced in the lower courts instead of more radical solutions, liberals can make a case with which conservatives might agree.

Rather than follow the Beltway’s cynical damage-control playbook, the president should put on a master class in how to take responsibility for a mistake.

Trump’s “Schedule F” plan to eliminate workplace protections for the civil service was averted in 2020. But the GOP still dreams of the purge.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are teeming with ideas to halt the practice of self-enrichment. Which one will they choose?